ArticleESMO open2019
Community-driven development of a modified progression-free survival ratio for precision oncology.
Article in ESMO open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Phase 2 study of TAS-117, an allosteric akt inhibitor in advanced solid tumors harboring phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog gene mutations.Investigational new drugs · 2021Trial
- Time dependent outcomes modeling in a real-world analysis of the molecular tumor board at University Cancer Center Hamburg (2016-2022).The oncologist · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The Dilemma of David Versus Goliath After NEOPAN.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking progression-free survival ratio as primary endpoint in precision oncology clinical trials.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Comparisons of treatment performance and therapy sequences in neuroendocrine neoplasms using progression-free survival ratios.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Mutational Landscape Assessed in Tumor Tissue and Circulating Tumor DNA During Treatment of Patients with HER2/ERBB2-Mutated Solid Tumors.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Real-World Data From a Molecular Tumor Board-Assisted Cancer Care From a Single Center in The Czech Republic: Is Precision Oncology an Accessible Option, or a Privilege for a Minority of Patients?Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1-Year Follow-Up of the FIRST-Dx Study.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Real-world performance analysis of a universal computational reasoning model for precision oncology in lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- BRAF mutant appendiceal adenocarcinoma differs from colorectal cancer but responds to BRAF-targeted therapy.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2024Review
- Identification of barriers to implementation of precision oncology in patients with rare cancers.Cancer science · 2024Article
- App-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes in the Molecular Tumor Board in the Center for Personalized Medicine-(TRACE).Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
- Real world evidence reveals improved survival outcomes in biliary tract cancer through molecular matched targeted treatment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Presented to the Molecular Tumor Board at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich.Targeted oncology · 2023Observational
- Article
- Comprehensive genomic and epigenomic analysis in cancer of unknown primary guides molecularly-informed therapies despite heterogeneity.Nature communications · 2022Article
- The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Measuring the success of molecularly guided therapies is a major challenge in precision oncology trials. A commonly used endpoint is an intra-patient progression-free survival (PFS) ratio, defined as the PFS interval associated with molecularly guided therapy (PFS2) divided by the PFS interval associated with the last prior systemic therapy (PFS1), above 1.3 or, in some studies, above 1.33 or 1.5. Methods: To investigate if the concept of PFS ratios is in agreement with actual response evaluations by physicians, we conducted a survey among members of the MASTER (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research) Programme of the German Cancer Consortium who were asked to classify the success of molecularly guided therapies in 194 patients enrolled in the MOSCATO 01 trial based on PFS1 and PFS2 times. Results: A comparison of classification profiles revealed three distinct clusters of PFS benefit assessments. Only 29% of assessments were consistent with a PFS ratio threshold of 1.3, whereas the remaining 71% of participants applied a different classification scheme that did not rely on the relation between PFS times alone, but also took into account absolute PFS1 intervals. Based on these community-driven insights, we developed a modified PFS ratio that incorporates the influence of absolute PFS1 intervals on the judgement of clinical benefit by physicians. Application of the modified PFS ratio to outcome data from two recent precision oncology trials, MOSCATO 01 and WINTHER, revealed significantly improved concordance with physician-perceived clinical benefit and identified comparable proportions of patients who benefited from molecularly guided therapies. Conclusions: The modified PFS ratio may represent a meaningful clinical endpoint that could aid in the design and interpretation of future precision oncology trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.