ReviewSpinal cord series and cases2019
Addressing cardiometabolic risk in adults with spinal cord injury: acting now despite knowledge gaps.
Review in Spinal cord series and cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physical activity and cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of epidemiology · 2022Pooled it
- Taking risk to heart: An evaluation of cardiometabolic risk and screening guideline adherence in outpatients with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Meglumine cyclic adenylate improves cardiovascular hemodynamics and motor-function in a rat model of acute T4 thoracic spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2023Article
- Neurogenic Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2021Review
- Point: Counterpoint synopsis of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury.Spinal cord series and cases · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This perspective advocates for the adoption of recently published clinical practice guidelines on identifying and managing cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury (SCI). It makes the case for acting now, with the knowledge that we currently have, while continuing to address knowledge gaps with high-quality research studies in this area. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in people with SCI. Cardiometabolic disease (CMD) and risks are more likely to be overlooked after SCI. Unique SCI-related considerations impact both assessment and management of cardiometabolic risk. Risk factors and components of CMD including obesity, impaired glucose tolerance/insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension should be evaluated and managed to optimize the cardiometabolic health of this population. While it would be optimal to base all care on high-quality evidence-based research, its absence should not be an excuse for inaction. Applying what is currently known and filling the research gaps with empirical recommendations based on clinical rationale and expert consensus is both appropriate and necessary till more definitive SCI-specific evidence becomes available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.