Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31798924›Full record

ReviewFungal biology and biotechnology2019

Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and

Anuroopa Nanjundappa, Davis Joseph Bagyaraj, Anil Kumar Saxena, Murugan Kumar, Hillol Chakdar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mycorrhizal FungiPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Synergistic Interaction Between EndophyticPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Inoculation of Native Arbuscular Mycorrhizae andInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anuroopa NanjundappaCentre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development, 41 RBI Colony, Anand Nagar, Bangalore, 560024 India.
Davis Joseph BagyarajCentre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development, 41 RBI Colony, Anand Nagar, Bangalore, 560024 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3583-848X
Anil Kumar Saxena2ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau, Uttar Pradesh 275103 India.
Murugan Kumar2ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau, Uttar Pradesh 275103 India.
Hillol Chakdar2ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau, Uttar Pradesh 275103 India.
National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms · INDirectorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research · INGovernment of Karnataka · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microorganisms play an important role in enhancing soil fertility and plant health. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria form a key component of the soil microbial population. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic association with most of the cultivated crop plants and they help plants in phosphorus nutrition and protecting them against biotic and abiotic stresses. Many species of

Indexed as

AMFBacillusInteractionPlant nutrition

Identifiers

PMID31798924
PMCPMC6882151
OpenAlexW2990201203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.