Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31798918›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2019

First use of cenerimod, a selective S1P

Viktoria Hermann, Anastas Batalov, Svetlana Smakotina, Pierre-Eric Juif, Peter Cornelisse

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02472795 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-response Study to Investigate the Biological Activity, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ACT-334441 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02472795 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-response Study to Investigate the Biological Activity, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ACT-334441 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

TypeinterventionalSponsorViatris Innovation GmbHRan2015 to 2017Enrolled105ConditionsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusArmsMatching placebo, Cenerimod
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Lack of Effect of Cenerimod, a Selective S1PInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. In Vitro Characterization of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 1 (S1PInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Viktoria HermannIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-6892
Anastas BatalovRheumatology Department, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Svetlana SmakotinaKemerovo Regional Clinical Hospital, Kemerovo, Russia.
Pierre-Eric JuifIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Peter CornelisseIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Idorsia (Switzerland) · CHKemerovo Cardiology Center · RUMedical University Plovdiv · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of cenerimod-a potent, oral, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator-in patients with SLE.

methodsThis multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in two parts. In part A, patients with SLE were randomised 1:1:1:1 to receive oral cenerimod 0.5, 1 or 2 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Following an interim safety review of part A, additional patients were randomised 3:1 for part B and received cenerimod 4 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Endpoints included changes in total lymphocyte count, SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score (modified (mSLEDAI-2K) to exclude leucopenia), biomarker anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies, pharmacokinetic assessments and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

resultsPart A included 49 patients (1:1:1:1 receiving cenerimod 0.5, 1 or 2 mg, or placebo) and part B included 18 patients (13 cenerimod; 5 placebo). Cenerimod caused a statistically significant dose-dependent reduction in total lymphocyte count from baseline to end of treatment (EOT). Compared with placebo at EOT, cenerimod 4 mg had an estimated treatment effect on change from baseline in mSLEDAI-2K score of -2.420 (p=0.0306), and on anti-dsDNA antibodies of -64.55 U/mL (p=0.0082), suggesting clinical and biological improvement in these exploratory efficacy analyses. Trough plasma concentrations were dose proportional and reached steady-state conditions after 4 weeks of once daily dosing. All groups reported similar, non-dose-related frequencies of TEAEs (cenerimod 0.5 mg: 41.7%; 1 mg: 41.7%; 2 mg: 46.2%; 4 mg: 38.5% and placebo: 58.8%). A small, dose-related, non-clinically relevant decrease in heart rate was only observed in the first 6 hours after initiation.

conclusionsWith an acceptable safety profile, the efficacy findings suggest that cenerimod has the potential to treat patients with SLE. Further investigation in larger patient populations with longer treatment duration is warranted.

Indexed as

cenerimodphase IIS1P1sphingosine-1-phosphate receptorsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID31798918
PMCPMC6861098
OpenAlexW2984859377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.