ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Minimally invasive biopsy in retroperitoneal tumors.
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural History of Primary Retroperitoneal Extra-Visceral Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors (PEC): A Study from Transatlantic and Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG).Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Perirenal schwannoma mimicking a renal mass: A diagnostic pitfall - Case report.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Impact of retroperitoneal tumors on the digestive tract (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Recurrent chylous ascites in patient with previous retroperitoneal radiation treatment.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- [Preoperative diagnostics and typing of abdominal soft tissue sarcomas].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
- Animal Models in Bladder Cancer.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- The importance of adrenal venous sampling in ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome: A case report and literature review.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- A new era for monoclonal antibodies with applications in neurology (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Multiple sclerosis, human herpesvirus 4 and thyroid collision tumor: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Highlights of the 3rd conference of the Romanian Association of Immuno-Dermatology and the 37th conference of the Romanian Society of Immunology held in Bucharest between September 19 and 22, 2019.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive biopsy procedures have proven over the years to be essential for obtaining a correct diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumors, that allows proper therapeutical conduct. These procedures offer valuable tissue fragments for histopathological examination, that permits the distinction between benign and malignant tumors, identifying the tumors that can benefit from neo-adjuvant treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy and those that have a direct surgical indication. We have searched the existing data regarding minimally invasive biopsy in retroperitoneal tumors using the PubMed database, in order to evaluate the role of this procedure in establishing a correct diagnosis, as well as to find out the risks of tumor cell seeding and local recurrence after needle biopsy. The risk of tumor cell seeding is very low (<2%) and in some cases, it is considered negligible (<0.5%). Compared to open biopsy, needle biopsy seems to be associated with a significantly lower risk of tumor cell seeding. According to the existing data, the incidence of needle track tumor cell seeding also depends on the histological type of the tumors. Image-guided retroperitoneal biopsy has proven to be low cost, accessible, and a reliable procedure (in terms of diagnostic accuracy), usually associating with a low rate of complications and a low risk of tumor seeding. Several authors have underlined the importance of the retroperitoneal approach and the association with a co-axial imaging technique in order to avoid potentially deadly complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.