Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31798722›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019

Minimally invasive biopsy in retroperitoneal tumors.

Radu Dragos Marcu, Camelia Cristina Diaconu, Traian Constantin, Bogdan Socea, Florentina Ionita-Radu, Dan Liviu Dorel Mischianu, Ovidiu Gabriel Bratu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of retroperitoneal tumors on the digestive tract (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. [Preoperative diagnostics and typing of abdominal soft tissue sarcomas].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Radu Dragos MarcuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Camelia Cristina DiaconuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Traian ConstantinUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan SoceaUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Florentina Ionita-RaduGastroenterology Department, Emergency University Central Military Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.
Dan Liviu Dorel MischianuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ovidiu Gabriel BratuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive biopsy procedures have proven over the years to be essential for obtaining a correct diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumors, that allows proper therapeutical conduct. These procedures offer valuable tissue fragments for histopathological examination, that permits the distinction between benign and malignant tumors, identifying the tumors that can benefit from neo-adjuvant treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy and those that have a direct surgical indication. We have searched the existing data regarding minimally invasive biopsy in retroperitoneal tumors using the PubMed database, in order to evaluate the role of this procedure in establishing a correct diagnosis, as well as to find out the risks of tumor cell seeding and local recurrence after needle biopsy. The risk of tumor cell seeding is very low (<2%) and in some cases, it is considered negligible (<0.5%). Compared to open biopsy, needle biopsy seems to be associated with a significantly lower risk of tumor cell seeding. According to the existing data, the incidence of needle track tumor cell seeding also depends on the histological type of the tumors. Image-guided retroperitoneal biopsy has proven to be low cost, accessible, and a reliable procedure (in terms of diagnostic accuracy), usually associating with a low rate of complications and a low risk of tumor seeding. Several authors have underlined the importance of the retroperitoneal approach and the association with a co-axial imaging technique in order to avoid potentially deadly complications.

Indexed as

minimally invasive biopsy techniquesretroperitoneal tumorstumor cell seedingtumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID31798722
PMCPMC6880447
OpenAlexW2973310455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.