Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31798391›Full record

ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Consensus Meeting of Breast Imaging: BI-RADS® and Beyond.

Markus Müller-Schimpfle, Werner Bader, Pascal Baltzer, Maria Bernathova, Michael Fuchsjäger, Michael Golatta, Thomas H Helbich, Karin Hellerhoff, Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner, Claudia Kurtz and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Markus Müller-SchimpfleClinic of Radiology, Neuroradiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Werner BaderDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Pascal BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Maria BernathovaDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Michael FuchsjägerDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael GolattaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas H HelbichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Karin HellerhoffDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Sylvia H Heywang-KöbrunnerReference Center Mammography Munich and FFB gGmbH, Munich, Germany.
Claudia KurtzDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Alexander MundingerDepartment of Radiology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Marienhospital Osnabrück GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany.
Katja C Siegmann-LuzReference Center Mammography Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Per SkaaneDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Chistine SolbachDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Stefanie WeigelInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Medical University of Vienna · ATFive Continents Museum · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DEKlinikum Frankfurt Höchst · DELuzerner Kantonsspital · CHMarienhospital Osnabrück · DEMedical University of Graz · ATOslo University Hospital · NOPathodiagnostik Berlin · DERotkreuzklinikum München · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizers of medical educational courses are often confronted with questions that are clinically relevant yet trespassing the frontiers of scientifically proven, evidence-based medicine at the point of care. Therefore, since 2007 organizers of breast teaching courses in German language met biannually to find a consensus in clinically relevant questions that have not been definitely answered by science. The questions were prepared during the 3 months before the meeting according to a structured process and finally agreed upon the day before the consensus meeting. At the consensus meeting, the open questions concerning 2D/3D mammography, breast ultrasound, MR mammography, interventions as well as risk-based imaging of the breast were presented first for electronic anonymized voting, and then the results of the audience were separately displayed from the expert votes. Thereafter, an introductory statement of the moderator was followed by pros/cons of two experts, and subsequently the final voting was performed. With ≥75% of votes of the expert panel, an answer qualified as a consensus statement. Seventeen consensus statements were gained, addressing for instance the use of 2D/3D mammography, breast ultrasound in screening, MR mammography in women with intermediate breast cancer risk, markers for localization of pathologic axillary lymph nodes, and standards in risk-based imaging of the breast. After the evaluation, comments from the experts on each field were gathered supplementarily. Methodology, transparency, and soundness of statements achieve a unique yield for all course organizers and provide solid pathways for decision making in breast imaging.

Indexed as

Breast interventionImagingMagnetic resonance imagingTomosynthesisTumor localizationUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31798391
PMCPMC6883472
OpenAlexW2979073616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.