ArticleJurimetrics2018
GRANULAR PATIENT CONTROL OF PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: FEDERAL AND STATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS.
Article in Jurimetrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Pooled it
- FHIR Granular Sensitive Data Segmentation.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Physicians' Perspectives on HL7 Information Policy Sensitive Value Set: A Validation Study through Health Concept Categorization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 2): Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Mental health professional perspectives on health data sharing: Mixed methods study.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Mental health professionals' perceptions on patients control of data sharing.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Pilot evaluation of sensitive data segmentation technology for privacy.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
- Ingredient-based method to create medication lists and support granular data segmentation.Health informatics journalArticle
- My data choices: Pilot evaluation of patient-controlled medical record sharing technology.Health informatics journalArticle
- Physicians differ in their perceptions of sensitive medical records: Survey and interview study.Health informatics journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of electronic medical records and health information exchanges has facilitated the possibility of patients exercising increasingly granular control over sensitive health information. In principle, patients should be able to control which of their health information is made accessible to which of their healthcare providers. To meet this goal, the architects of any system of granular control of patients' health information face a variety of challenges. In addition to technical, ethical, and prudential considerations, the architects of any effective system must also ensure compliance with applicable legal requirements. The extent of a patient's permissible control depends upon whether governing law
Identifiers
31798215PMC6890413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.