Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31798006›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Species-specific transcriptional profiles of the gut and gut microbiome of Ceratitis quilicii and Ceratitis rosa sensu stricto.

Fathiya M Khamis, Paul O Mireji, Fidelis L O Ombura, Anna R Malacrida, Erick O Awuoche, Martin Rono, Samira A Mohamed, Chrysantus M Tanga, Sunday Ekesi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fathiya M KhamisInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. fkhamis@icipe.org.
Paul O MirejiBiotechnology Research Institute, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, P.O. Box 362-00902, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Fidelis L O OmburaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anna R MalacridaDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Corso Strada Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Erick O AwuocheBiotechnology Research Institute, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, P.O. Box 362-00902, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Martin RonoCentre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P.O. Box 428, Kilifi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7255-821X
Samira A MohamedInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Chrysantus M TangaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sunday EkesiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KEMeru University of Science and Technology · KEUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly species, Ceratitis rosa sensu stricto and Ceratitis quilicii, are sibling species restricted to the lowland and highland regions, respectively. Until recently, these sibling species were considered as allopatric populations of C. rosa with distinct bionomics. We used deep Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology on intact guts of individuals from the two sibling species to compare their transcriptional profiles and simultaneously understand gut microbiome and host molecular processes and identify distinguishing genetic differences between the two species. Since the genomes of both species had not been published previously, the transcriptomes were assembled de novo into transcripts. Microbe-specific transcript orthologs were separated from the assembly by filtering searches of the transcripts against microbe databases using OrthoMCL. We then used differential expression analysis of host-specific transcripts (i.e. those remaining after the microbe-specific transcripts had been removed) and microbe-specific transcripts from the two-sibling species to identify defining species-specific transcripts that were present in only one fruit fly species or the other, but not in both. In C. quilicii females, bacterial transcripts of Pectobacterium spp., Enterobacterium buttiauxella, Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella variicola were upregulated compared to the C. rosa s.s. females. Comparison of expression levels of the host transcripts revealed a heavier investment by C. quilicii (compared with C. rosa s.s.) in: immunity; energy production; cell proliferation; insecticide resistance; reproduction and proliferation; and redox reactions that are usually associated with responses to stress and degradation of fruit metabolites.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnterobacter cloacaeEnterobacteriaceaeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene Expression RegulationHost-Pathogen InteractionsKlebsiellaPectobacteriumPhylogenySpecies SpecificityTephritidaeTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID31798006
PMCPMC6892911
OpenAlexW2991793842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.