ArticleScientific reports2019
Influence of muscle length on the stretch-shortening cycle in skinned rabbit soleus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of caffeine on the maximal isometric and concentric force produced by skinned fibers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The effect of stretch-shortening magnitude and muscle-tendon unit length on performance enhancement in a stretch-shortening cycle.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Evidence for Muscle Cell-Based Mechanisms of Enhanced Performance in Stretch-Shortening Cycle in Skeletal Muscle.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Energy Cost of Force Production After a Stretch-Shortening Cycle in Skinned Muscle Fibers: Does Muscle Efficiency Increase?Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle force generated during shortening is instantaneously increased after active stretch. This phenomenon is called as stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) effect. It has been suggested that residual force enhancement contributes to the SSC effect. If so, the magnitude of SSC effect should be larger in the longer muscle length condition, because the residual force enhancement is prominent in the long muscle length condition. This hypothesis was examined by performing the SSC in the short and long muscle length conditions. Skinned fibers obtained from rabbit soleus (N = 20) were used in this study. To calculate the magnitude of SSC effect, the SSC trial (isometric-eccentric-concentric-isometric) and the control trial (isometric-concentric-isometric) were conducted in the short (within the range of 2.4 to 2.7 μm) and long muscle (within the range of 3.0 to 3.3 μm). The magnitude of SSC effect was calculated as the relative increase in the mechanical work attained during the shortening phase between control and SSC trials. As a result, the magnitude of SSC effect was significantly larger in the long (176.8 ± 18.1%) than in the short muscle length condition (157.4 ± 8.5%) (p < 0.001). This result supports our hypothesis that the magnitude of SSC effect is larger in the longer muscle length condition, possibly due to the larger magnitude of residual force enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.