Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797870›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Structural heterogeneity of α-synuclein fibrils amplified from patient brain extracts.

Timo Strohäker, Byung Chul Jung, Shu-Hao Liou, Claudio O Fernandez, Dietmar Riedel, Stefan Becker, Glenda M Halliday, Marina Bennati, Woojin S Kim, Seung-Jae Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Timo StrohäkerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Von-Siebold-Str. 3a, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Byung Chul JungDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Shu-Hao LiouRG EPR Spectroscopy, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Faßberg 11, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9716-6108
Claudio O FernandezMax Planck Laboratory for Structural Biology, Chemistry and Molecular Biophysics of Rosario (MPLbioR, UNR-MPIbpC), S2002LRK, Rosario, Argentina.
Dietmar RiedelDepartment for Electron Microscopy, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Faßberg 11, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefan BeckerDepartment for NMR-based Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Faßberg 11, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-5740
Glenda M HallidayBrain and Mind Centre and Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-8398
Marina BennatiRG EPR Spectroscopy, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Faßberg 11, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Woojin S KimBrain and Mind Centre and Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. woojin.kim@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-933X
Seung-Jae LeeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Korea. sjlee66@snu.ac.kr.
Markus ZweckstetterGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Von-Siebold-Str. 3a, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. Markus.Zweckstetter@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-6581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) are clinically distinctive diseases that feature a common neuropathological hallmark of aggregated α-synuclein. Little is known about how differences in α-synuclein aggregate structure affect disease phenotype. Here, we amplified α-synuclein aggregates from PD and MSA brain extracts and analyzed the conformational properties using fluorescent probes, NMR spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance. We also generated and analyzed several in vitro α-synuclein polymorphs. We found that brain-derived α-synuclein fibrils were structurally different to all of the in vitro polymorphs analyzed. Importantly, there was a greater structural heterogeneity among α-synuclein fibrils from the PD brain compared to those from the MSA brain, possibly reflecting on the greater variability of disease phenotypes evident in PD. Our findings have significant ramifications for the use of non-brain-derived α-synuclein fibrils in PD and MSA studies, and raise important questions regarding the one disease-one strain hypothesis in the study of α-synucleinopathies.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overalpha-SynucleinBrainFemaleHumansMaleModels, MolecularMultiple System AtrophyParkinson DiseaseProtein Aggregation, PathologicalProtein ConformationSynucleinopathiesTissue Extractsalpha-SynucleinTissue Extracts

Identifiers

PMID31797870
PMCPMC6893031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.