ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019
Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship,
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why human connection is the true metric of research success.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Citation self-awareness for a fairer academic publishing landscape.Bioscience · 2026Review
- Who deserves credit, who receives credit? A cross-sectional survey on the handling of co-authorship in medical dissertations in Germany.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- The value of learned societies in the biological sciences: benefits, threats, and futures.BMC biology · 2026Review
- Examining gender and ethnic disparities in scientific authorship to promote a culture of equity, diversity and inclusion at a university school of public health.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Knowledge mapping and research trends of IL-22 from 2014 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- The 100 Most Impactful Articles on Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Altmetric Analysis.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2024Article
- Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- The Most Impactful Articles on the Shoulder Labrum From the United States or Europe, and Decreased Level of Evidence Is Associated With Increased Altmetric Attention Score.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Article
- The H-index is an unreliable research metric for evaluating the publication impact of experimental scientists.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2024Article
- Looking back to inform the future: a review of published paramedicine research.BMC health services research · 2023Review
- Female Dynamics in Authorship of Scientific Publications in the Public Library of Science: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
- Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills.Nucleic acids research · 2022Review
- Article
- Removing systemic barriers to equity, diversity, and inclusion: Report of the 2019 Plant Science Research Network workshop "Inclusivity in the Plant Sciences".Plant direct · 2022Article
- Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Article
- Academic Promotion of Physicians in Medical Schools: A Special Focus on Primary Health Care in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research is a highly competitive profession where evaluation plays a central role; journals are ranked and individuals are evaluated based on their publication number, the number of times they are cited and their
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.