Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797641›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2020

Computationally efficient, exact, covariate-adjusted genetic principal component analysis by leveraging individual marker summary statistics from large biobanks.

Jack M Wolf, Martha Barnard, Xueting Xia, Nathan Ryder, Jason Westra, Nathan Tintle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack M WolfDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA, wolf5@stolaf.edu.
Martha Barnard
Xueting Xia
Nathan Ryder
Jason Westra
Nathan Tintle

Funding

Analyzing the behavior and interpreting the results of gene based tests of rare variant associationR15HG006915 · NHGRI · DORDT COLLEGE · PI TINTLE, NATHAN L · 2012 to 2020
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R15 HG006915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularization of biobanks provides an unprecedented amount of genetic and phenotypic information that can be used to research the relationship between genetics and human health. Despite the opportunities these datasets provide, they also pose many problems associated with computational time and costs, data size and transfer, and privacy and security. The publishing of summary statistics from these biobanks, and the use of them in a variety of downstream statistical analyses, alleviates many of these logistical problems. However, major questions remain about how to use summary statistics in all but the simplest downstream applications. Here, we present a novel approach to utilize basic summary statistics (estimates from single marker regressions on single phenotypes) to evaluate more complex phenotypes using multivariate methods. In particular, we present a covariate-adjusted method for conducting principal component analysis (PCA) utilizing only biobank summary statistics. We validate exact formulas for this method, as well as provide a framework of estimation when specific summary statistics are not available, through simulation. We apply our method to a real data set of fatty acid and genomic data.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksComputational BiologyGenomicsComputer SimulationHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31797641
PMCPMC6907735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.