Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797639›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2020

Robust-ODAL: Learning from heterogeneous health systems without sharing patient-level data.

Jiayi Tong, Rui Duan, Ruowang Li, Martijn J Scheuemie, Jason H Moore, Yong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Learning competing risks across multiple hospitals: one-shot distributed algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review of Clinical Research Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiayi TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,19104, USA.
Rui Duan
Ruowang Li
Martijn J Scheuemie
Jason H Moore
Yong Chen

Funding

Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHR) contain extensive patient data on various health outcomes and risk predictors, providing an efficient and wide-reaching source for health research. Integrated EHR data can provide a larger sample size of the population to improve estimation and prediction accuracy. To overcome the obstacle of sharing patient-level data, distributed algorithms were developed to conduct statistical analyses across multiple clinical sites through sharing only aggregated information. However, the heterogeneity of data across sites is often ignored by existing distributed algorithms, which leads to substantial bias when studying the association between the outcomes and exposures. In this study, we propose a privacy-preserving and communication-efficient distributed algorithm which accounts for the heterogeneity caused by a small number of the clinical sites. We evaluated our algorithm through a systematic simulation study motivated by real-world scenarios and applied our algorithm to multiple claims datasets from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) network. The results showed that the proposed method performed better than the existing distributed algorithm ODAL and a meta-analysis method.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyElectronic Health RecordsInformation DisseminationMachine LearningAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansMedical Informatics

Identifiers

PMID31797639
PMCPMC6905508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.