Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797635›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2020

Implementing a Cloud Based Method for Protected Clinical Trial Data Sharing.

Gaurav Luthria, Qingbo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Data Sharing Goals for Nonprofit Funders of Clinical Trials.Journal of participatory medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gaurav LuthriaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, gluthria@g.harvard.edu.
Qingbo Wang

Funding

Training Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative GenomicsT32HG002295 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Peter J Park · 2001 to 2026
$15.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials generate a large amount of data that have been underutilized due to obstacles that prevent data sharing including risking patient privacy, data misrepresentation, and invalid secondary analyses. In order to address these obstacles, we developed a novel data sharing method which ensures patient privacy while also protecting the interests of clinical trial investigators. Our flexible and robust approach involves two components: (1) an advanced cloud-based querying language that allows users to test hypotheses without direct access to the real clinical trial data and (2) corresponding synthetic data for the query of interest that allows for exploratory research and model development. Both components can be modified by the clinical trial investigator depending on factors such as the type of trial or number of patients enrolled. To test the effectiveness of our system, we first implement a simple and robust permutation based synthetic data generator. We then use the synthetic data generator coupled with our querying language to identify significant relationships among variables in a realistic clinical trial dataset.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingComputational BiologyInformation DisseminationAlgorithmsConfidentialityHumansInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

PMID31797635
PMCPMC6954005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.