Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797633›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2020

Network-Based Matching of Patients and Targeted Therapies for Precision Oncology.

Qingzhi Liu, Min Jin Ha, Rupam Bhattacharyya, Lana Garmire, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingzhi LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Min Jin Ha
Rupam Bhattacharyya
Lana Garmire
Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
An Integrative Omics Approach to Identify Biomarkers Related to Preeclampsia and Breast Cancer RisksR01HD084633 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Cancer precision medicine through spatially informative single cell image and transcriptomics data analysisR01LM012373 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2016 to 2024
$2.4M
Graph-based Bayesian analysis of Genomics and Proteomics DataR01CA194391 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, MALLICK, BANI K · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Integrative methods for high-dimensional genomics dataR01CA160736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
An Integrative Bioinformatics Approach to Study Single Cancer Cell HeterogeneityK01ES025434 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2014 to 2018
$905k
Proteomic-based integrated subject-specific networks in cancerR21CA220299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, HA, MIN JIN · 2018 to 2019
$378k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194391NCI NIH HHS R21 CA220299NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084633NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES025434NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive acquisition of high-throughput molecular profiling data across model systems (human tumors and cancer cell lines) and drug sensitivity data, makes precision oncology possible - allowing clinicians to match the right drug to the right patient. Current supervised models for drug sensitivity prediction, often use cell lines as exemplars of patient tumors and for model training. However, these models are limited in their ability to accurately predict drug sensitivity of individual cancer patients to a large set of drugs, given the paucity of patient drug sensitivity data used for testing and high variability across different drugs. To address these challenges, we developed a multilayer network-based approach to impute individual patients' responses to a large set of drugs. This approach considers the triplet of patients, cell lines and drugs as one inter-connected holistic system. We first use the omics profiles to construct a patient-cell line network and determine best matching cell lines for patient tumors based on robust measures of network similarity. Subsequently, these results are used to impute the "missing link" between each individual patient and each drug, called Personalized Imputed Drug Sensitivity Score (PIDS-Score), which can be construed as a measure of the therapeutic potential of a drug or therapy. We applied our method to two subtypes of lung cancer patients, matched these patients with cancer cell lines derived from 19 tissue types based on their functional proteomics profiles, and computed their PIDS-Scores to 251 drugs and experimental compounds. We identified the best representative cell lines that conserve lung cancer biology and molecular targets. The PIDS-Score based top sensitive drugs for the entire patient cohort as well as individual patients are highly related to lung cancer in terms of their targets, and their PIDS-Scores are significantly associated with patient clinical outcomes. These findings provide evidence that our method is useful to narrow the scope of possible effective patient-drug matchings for implementing evidence-based personalized medicine strategies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyLung NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorGenomicsHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31797633
PMCPMC7301202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.