ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2020
Hadoop and PySpark for reproducibility and scalability of genomic sequencing studies.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lessons Learned From Building a Data Platform for Longitudinal, Analytical Use Cases and Scaling to 77 German Hospitals: Implementation Report.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- NIAGADS Alzheimer's GenomicsDB: A resource for exploring Alzheimer's disease genetic and genomic knowledge.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern genomic studies are rapidly growing in scale, and the analytical approaches used to analyze genomic data are increasing in complexity. Genomic data management poses logistic and computational challenges, and analyses are increasingly reliant on genomic annotation resources that create their own data management and versioning issues. As a result, genomic datasets are increasingly handled in ways that limit the rigor and reproducibility of many analyses. In this work, we examine the use of the Spark infrastructure for the management, access, and analysis of genomic data in comparison to traditional genomic workflows on typical cluster environments. We validate the framework by reproducing previously published results from the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project. Using the framework and analyses designed using Jupyter notebooks, Spark provides improved workflows, reduces user-driven data partitioning, and enhances the portability and reproducibility of distributed analyses required for large-scale genomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31797624PMC6956992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.