Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797619›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2020

A Literature-Based Knowledge Graph Embedding Method for Identifying Drug Repurposing Opportunities in Rare Diseases.

Daniel N Sosa, Alexander Derry, Margaret Guo, Eric Wei, Connor Brinton, Russ B Altman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synonym Augmentation for Rare Disease Identification in Unstructured Data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Graph-Based Gene Embedding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. AΙ-Driven Drug Repurposing: Applications and Challenges.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predicting Natural Product-Drug Interactions with Knowledge Graph Embeddings.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Graph Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel N SosaBiomedical Informatics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Alexander Derry
Margaret Guo
Eric Wei
Connor Brinton
Russ B Altman
Stanford University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHUA, KATRIN F · 1985 to 2021
$33.8M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Text Mining for High-fidelity Curation and Discovery of Gene-drug-phenotype RelationshipsR01LM005652 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2000 to 2018
$6.2M
Undergraduate Summer Research Experiences Support for Combining systems biology and structural biology to find new therapeuticsR01GM102365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Biomedical Data Science Graduate Training at StanfordT32LM012409 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
Biomedical Data Translator Technical Feasibility Assessment of Reasoning Tool: Stanford UniversityOT2TR002515 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2018 to 2019
$845k
NCATS NIH HHS OT2 TR002515NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102365NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007365NLM NIH HHS R01 LM005652NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of Americans are affected by rare diseases, many of which have poor survival rates. However, the small market size of individual rare diseases, combined with the time and capital requirements of pharmaceutical R&D, have hindered the development of new drugs for these cases. A promising alternative is drug repurposing, whereby existing FDA-approved drugs might be used to treat diseases different from their original indications. In order to generate drug repurposing hypotheses in a systematic and comprehensive fashion, it is essential to integrate information from across the literature of pharmacology, genetics, and pathology. To this end, we leverage a newly developed knowledge graph, the Global Network of Biomedical Relationships (GNBR). GNBR is a large, heterogeneous knowledge graph comprising drug, disease, and gene (or protein) entities linked by a small set of semantic themes derived from the abstracts of biomedical literature. We apply a knowledge graph embedding method that explicitly models the uncertainty associated with literature-derived relationships and uses link prediction to generate drug repurposing hypotheses. This approach achieves high performance on a gold-standard test set of known drug indications (AUROC = 0.89) and is capable of generating novel repurposing hypotheses, which we independently validate using external literature sources and protein interaction networks. Finally, we demonstrate the ability of our model to produce explanations of its predictions.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningPattern Recognition, AutomatedComputational BiologyHumansKnowledge BasesRare Diseases

Identifiers

PMID31797619
PMCPMC6937428
OpenAlexW2998922495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.