Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797239›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2020

Stimulation-related intraoperative seizures during awake surgery: a review of available evidences.

Elena Roca, Johan Pallud, Francesco Guerrini, Pier Paolo Panciani, Marco Fontanella, Giannantonio Spena

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena RocaNeurosurgery, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. rocaelena@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2314-7000
Johan PalludDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France.
Francesco GuerriniUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Pier Paolo PancianiNeurosurgery, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marco FontanellaNeurosurgery, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Giannantonio SpenaNeurosurgery, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Awake surgery is a well-defined procedure with a very low morbidity. In particular, stimulation-related intraoperative seizure (IOS) is a commonly discussed and serious complication associated with awake surgery. Here, we reviewed the literature on awake surgery and IOS and sought to obtain evidences on the predictive factors of IOS and on the effect of IOS on postoperative outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive search of the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify potentially relevant articles from 2000 to 2019. We used combinations of the following search terms: "intraoperative seizure awake craniotomy," "awake surgery seizures," and pertinent associations; the search was restricted to publications in English and only to papers published in the last 20 years. The search returned 141 articles, including 39 papers that reported the IOS rate during awake craniotomy. The reported IOS rates ranged between 0 and 24% (mean, 7.7%). Only few studies have assessed the relationships between awake surgery and IOS, and hence, drawing clear conclusions is difficult. Nevertheless, IOS does not cause permanent and severe postoperative deficits, but can affect the patient's status perioperatively and the hospitalization duration. Anterior tumor location is an important perioperative factor associated with high IOS risk, whereas having seizures at tumor diagnosis does not seem to influence. However, the role of antiepileptic drug administration and prophylaxis remains unclear. In conclusion, given the difficulty in identifying predictors of IOS, we believe that prompt action at onset and awareness of appropriate management methods are vital.

Indexed as

WakefulnessCraniotomyElectric StimulationHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsNeurosurgical ProceduresSeizuresAwake craniotomyAwake surgeryEpileptic seizuresGliomasIntraoperative seizures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.