Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797160›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2020

Time Pressure During Primary Care Office Visits: a Prospective Evaluation of Data from the Healthy Work Place Study.

Kriti Prasad, Sara Poplau, Roger Brown, Steven Yale, Ellie Grossman, Anita B Varkey, Eric Williams, Hannah Neprash, Mark Linzer, Healthy Work Place (HWP) Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Workplace Mental Health Programs for Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kriti PrasadDivision of General Internal Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sara PoplauDivision of General Internal Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Roger BrownSchool of Nursing, UW-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Steven YaleUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Lake Nona, Orlando, FL, USA.
Ellie GrossmanCambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anita B VarkeyLoyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
Eric WilliamsUniversity of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Hannah NeprashUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mark LinzerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Mark.linzer@hcmed.org.
Healthy Work Place (HWP) Investigators
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute · USUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota · USCambridge Health Alliance · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between worklife factors, clinician outcomes, and time pressure during office visits is unclear.

objectiveTo quantify associations between time pressure, workplace characteristics ,and clinician outcomes.

designProspective analysis of data from the Healthy Work Place randomized trial.

participants168 physicians and advanced practice clinicians in 34 primary care practices in Upper Midwest and East Coast. MAIN MEASURES AND

methodsTime pressure was present when clinicians needed more time than allotted to provide quality care. Other metrics included work control, work pace (calm to chaotic), organizational culture and clinician satisfaction, stress, burnout, and intent to leave the practice. Hierarchical analysis assessed relationships between time pressure, organizational characteristics, and clinician outcomes. Adjusted differences between clinicians with and without time pressure were expressed as effect sizes (ESs). KEY

resultsSixty-seven percent of clinicians needed more time for new patients and 53% needed additional time for follow-up appointments. Time pressure in new patient visits was more prevalent in general internists than in family physicians (74% vs 55%, p < 0.05), women versus men (78% vs 55%, p < 0.01), and clinicians with larger numbers of complex psychosocial (81% vs 59%, p < 0.01) and Limited English Proficiency patients (95% vs 57%, p < 0.001). Time pressure in new patient visits was associated with lack of control, clinician stress, and intent to leave (ESs small to moderate, p < 0.05). Time pressure in follow-up visits was associated with chaotic workplaces and burnout (small to moderate ESs, p's < 0.05). Time pressure improved over time in workplaces with values alignment and an emphasis on quality.

conclusionsTime pressure, more common in women and general internists, was related to chaos, control and culture, and stress, burnout, and intent to leave. Future studies should evaluate these findings in larger and more geographically diverse samples.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionWorkplaceFemaleHumansMaleOffice VisitsPrimary Health CareProspective Studieshealth services researchmedical culturephysician satisfactionprimary caretime pressureworkforce

Identifiers

PMID31797160
PMCPMC7018911
OpenAlexW2994242459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.