Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797142›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

A Comparison of the Efficiency of Using a Deep CNN Approach with Other Common Regression Methods for the Prediction of EGFR Expression in Glioblastoma Patients.

Mohammadreza Hedyehzadeh, Keivan Maghooli, Mohammad MomenGharibvand, Stephen Pistorius

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammadreza HedyehzadehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Keivan MaghooliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. K_maghooli@srbiau.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-0980-0154
Mohammad MomenGharibvandDepartment of Radiology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Stephen PistoriusDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To estimate epithermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression level in glioblastoma (GBM) patients using radiogenomic analysis of magnetic resonance images (MRI). A comparative study using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN)-based regression, deep neural network, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, elastic net regression, and linear regression with no regularization was carried out to estimate EGFR expression of 166 GBM patients. Except for the deep CNN case, overfitting was prevented by using feature selection, and loss values for each method were compared. The loss values in the training phase for deep CNN, deep neural network, Elastic net, LASSO, and the linear regression with no regularization were 2.90, 8.69, 7.13, 14.63, and 21.76, respectively, while in the test phase, the loss values were 5.94, 10.28, 13.61, 17.32, and 24.19 respectively. These results illustrate that the efficiency of the deep CNN approach is better than that of the other methods, including Lasso regression, which is a regression method known for its advantage in high-dimension cases. A comparison between deep CNN, deep neural network, and three other common regression methods was carried out, and the efficiency of the CNN deep learning approach, in comparison with other regression models, was demonstrated.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaErbB ReceptorsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerReceptors, Growth FactorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsReceptors, Growth FactorDeep learningGlioblastomaRadiogenomicRegression

Identifiers

PMID31797142
PMCPMC7165204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.