Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797081›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis.

Hanneke E M van der Hoek-Snieders, Antonius J M L van den Heuvel, Harmieke van Os-Medendorp, Digna M A Kamalski

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanneke E M van der Hoek-SniedersClinical Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5675-5520
Antonius J M L van den HeuvelClinical Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harmieke van Os-MedendorpClinical Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Digna M A KamalskiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, G05.129, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. ent-research@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (reference test) in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The search resulted in eight studies (334 fetuses) to be included: four prospective and four retrospective studies. The applicability concern was low. There was, however, a risk of selection and information bias. All studies showed that MRI well predicted the chance of cleft palate. The sensitivity results were homogeneous, but heterogeneity was assumed regarding the specificity estimate (Cochrane's Q test: p = 0.00). The pooled sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-0.99); the pooled specificity was 0.94 (0.89-0.97). The area under the curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.98-0.99).Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that MRI has an excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity for diagnosing cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Future research should assess applicability for clinical care.What is Known:• Using ultrasound for prenatal detection of cleft palate leads to misdiagnosis frequently.• MRI could potentially improve the prenatal detection rate of cleft palate.What is New:• Eight studies describe the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting cleft palate.• Combined results show excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingCleft PalateFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisSensitivity and SpecificityCleft palateDiagnostic accuracyMRIPrenatal

Identifiers

PMID31797081
PMCPMC6942582
OpenAlexW2992185191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.