ArticleMikrochimica acta2019
DNA-templated copper nanoparticles as signalling probe for electrochemical determination of microRNA-222.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Biosensor Technology for Early-Stage Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Specific Biomarkers: An Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- microRNA Detection via Nanostructured Biochips for Early Cancer Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Combination of ferrocene decorated gold nanoparticles and engineered primers for the direct reagentless determination of isothermally amplified DNA.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor is described for the determination of microRNAs. It is based on the use of DNA-templated copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) as signalling probe. MicroRNA-222 was selected as the model analyte. The probe was obtained from two different oligonucleotides (containing complementary bases) via hybridization chain reaction to form long DNA concatemers as template. The Cu NPs were formed by reaction of ascorbate with copper sulfate. The biosensor was fabricated as follows: (a) Capture probe (cDNA) with a thiolated group was immobilized on reduced graphene oxide modified with gold nanoparticles (rGO/Au NPs), (b) materials was placed on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE); (c) the modified electrode (cDNA/rGO/Au NPs/GCE) was sequentially hybridized with microRNA-222 and signal probe; this results in the formation of a sandwich structure of cDNA-microRNA-signal probe on surface of the modified electrode. Differential pulse voltammetry was employed to record the electrochemical response of biosensor in pH 6.0 solution. As a result, a sensitive oxidation current with a peak potential at 0.10 V (vs. SCE) was obtained corresponding to Cu NPs. The experimental conditions were optimized. Under optimal conditions, the biosensor exhibited wide linear response range (0.5 fM to 70 nM) and low limit of detection (0.03 fM; at S/N = 3). The assay possesses high selectivity and can discriminate analyte microRNA from single-base mismatched microRNA. Graphical abstractA sensitive electrochemical biosensor is described for the determination of microRNA-222 by using a dsDNA-templated Cu NPs as signalling probe. (A) represents the preparation of signal probe, and (B) represents the fabrication of electrochemical microRNA sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.