Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31797029›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2019

Robotic simultaneous resection for colorectal liver metastasis: feasibility for all types of liver resection.

Jonathan Navarro, Seoung Yoon Rho, Incheon Kang, Gi Hong Choi, Byung Soh Min

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. RoboticHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jonathan NavarroDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Seoung Yoon RhoDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Incheon KangDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Gi Hong ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. CHOIGH@yuhs.ac.
Byung Soh MinDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA laparoscopic approach is increasingly being utilized in simultaneous colorectal and liver resection (SCLR) for colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. However, this approach is technically challenging and hence has not been widely adopted. Robotic surgical systems could potentially overcome this problem. We aim to describe the feasibility and outcomes of robotic SCLR for colorectal carcinoma with liver metastasis.

methodsThe medical records of 12 patients who underwent robotic SCLR for colorectal cancer with liver metastasis between January 2008 and September 2018 were reviewed retrospectively.

resultsThe mean age was 59 years (range, 37-77 years). The liver resections were comprised of two right hepatectomies, one left hepatectomy, one left lateral sectionectomy, one segmentectomy of S3 and wedge resection (segment 7), one caudate lobectomy, one associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and five wedge resections involving segments 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8. The colorectal procedures involved seven low-anterior resections, two anterior resections, two right hemicolectomies, and one left hemicolectomy. The mean operative time was 449 min (range, 135-682 min) with a mean estimated blood loss of 274.3 mL (range, 40-780 mL). The mean length of hospital stay was 12 days (range, 5-28 days). No patients required conversion to laparotomy. Liver resection-related complications were two liver abscesses (Clavien-Dindo classification, one grade II and one grade III) and one case of ascites (grade I), whereas colorectal resection-related complications included one anastomosis leak (grade III) and one superficial wound infection (grade II). There were no deaths reported within 30 days of the procedure. With a mean follow-up duration of 31.5 ± 26.1 months, the overall survival and disease-free survival values were 75.2 and 47.1 months, respectively.

conclusionRobotic SCLR for colorectal neoplasm with liver metastasis can be performed safely even in cases requiring major liver resections, especially in a specialized center with a well-trained team.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresColorectal cancerLiver metastasisRobotic simultaneous resection

Identifiers

PMID31797029
OpenAlexW2993967196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.