ArticleInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2020
Acute changes in colonic PGE
Article in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceleration of benzo(a)pyrene-induced colon carcinogenesis by Western diet in a rat model of colon cancer.Current research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Lipid-Encapsulated Engineered Bacterial Living Materials Inhibit Cyclooxygenase II to Enhance Doxorubicin Toxicity.Biodesign research · 2024Article
- Comparison of Absolute Expression and Turnover Number of COX-1 and COX-2 in Human and Rodent Cells and Tissues.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
- Optimization of Erlotinib Plus Sulindac Dosing Regimens for Intestinal Cancer Prevention in an Apc-Mutant Model of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP).Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Article
- Chemopreventive Agent 3,3'-Diindolylmethane Inhibits MDM2 in Colorectal Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study sought to evaluate short-term treatment with COX-2 inhibitors and acute changes in colonic PGE2 levels as predictors of long-term efficacy in a genetic model of colorectal cancer.
methodsCelecoxib oral suspension (40 mg/kg BID) was dosed to Apc-mutant Pirc (F344/NTac-Apcam1137) rats for 4 days (short-term group), or the equivalent dose of 1500 ppm celecoxib was administered in the diet for 4 months (long-term group). Percent inhibition of colonic PGE2 was calculated, and the reduction in colonic PGE2 was assessed in relation to suppression of adenomatous colon polyps.
resultsColonic mucosa PGE2 was fourfold higher in Pirc than in F344 wild-type rats (21 vs. 5.6 pg/mg epithelial tissue), due at least in part to higher COX-2 expression, and this was confirmed by elevated PGE2-d11 levels in Pirc colonic S9 incubations. In the 4-day study, dose-dependent reductions in PGE2 were observed in colonic epithelium (-33% (P>0.05) and -57% (P=0.0012)), after low- and high-dose celecoxib treatments of 4 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg (bid), respectively. In the 4-month study, 1500 ppm celecoxib suppressed colonic epithelium PGE2 by 43.5%, and tumor multiplicity by 80% (P<0.0015). Suppression of plasma 6-keto PGF1α also was corroborated following long-term treatment with 1500 ppm celecoxib (P<0.05).
conclusionsAcute changes in colonic mucosa PGE2 provided a rapid means of predicting long-term chemopreventive effects from celecoxib, and might be useful for screening of new COX-2 inhibitor compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.