Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796995›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2020

The Gut Microbiota Composition of the Moth Brithys crini Reflects Insect Metamorphosis.

Francisco González-Serrano, Ana Elena Pérez-Cobas, Tania Rosas, Joaquín Baixeras, Amparo Latorre, Andrés Moya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gut microbiome of the grape berry moth,Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gut bacteria of lepidopteran herbivores facilitate digestion of plant toxins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francisco González-SerranoCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Ana Elena Pérez-CobasInstitut Pasteur and Biologie des Bactéries Intracellulaires, Paris, France.
Tania RosasInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology, University of València and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, València, Spain.
Joaquín BaixerasInstituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, University of València, València, Spain.
Amparo LatorreInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology, University of València and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, València, Spain.
Andrés MoyaInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology, University of València and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, València, Spain. andres.moya@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2867-1119

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PGC2018-099344-B-100Conselleria d'Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport Prometeo/2018/A/133Interreg Co-financeMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España BFU2015-64322-C2-1-RMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España SAF2015-65878-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lepidoptera is a highly diverse insect order with major importance in agriculture as many species are considered pests. The role of the gut microbiota in insect physiology is still poorly understood, despite the research undertaken in recent years. Furthermore, Lepidoptera are holometabolous insects and few studies have addressed the influence of the changes taking place on the gut microbiome composition and diversity during metamorphosis, especially in monophagous species. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to investigate the microbiota composition and diversity of the monophagous moth Brithys crini during three different life stages: egg, larvae (midgut and hindgut), and adult (gut). Our results showed that the microbiota composition of B. crini was stage specific, indicating that the developmental stage is a main factor affecting the gut microbiome in composition and potential functions. Moreover, the diversity of the gut microbiome reflected the developmental process, since a drop in diversity occurred between the larval and the adult phase, when the intestine is completely renewed. In spite of the changes in the gut microbiota during metamorphosis, 29 genera were conserved throughout the three developmental stages, mainly belonging to the Proteobacteria phylum, which define the core microbiome of B. crini. These genera seem to contribute to host physiology by participating in food digestion, nutrition, and detoxification mechanisms.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetamorphosis, BiologicalAnimalsFemaleLarvaMaleMothsOvumRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA sequencingB. criniGut microbiomeHolometabolous developmentMoth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.