Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796993›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020

Does the induced membrane have antibacterial properties? An experimental rat model of a chronic infected nonunion.

Sami Roukoz, Georges El Khoury, Elie Saghbini, Ibrahim Saliba, Aline Khazzaka, Maroun Rizkallah

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms of the Masquelet technique to promote bone defect repair and its influencing factors.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The induced membrane technique in animal models: a systematic review.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Effectiveness of percutaneous injection of autologous concentrated bone marrow aspirate combined with platelet-rich plasma in treatment of delayed fracture healing].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sami RoukozOrthopedic Surgery Department, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Georges El KhouryOrthopedic Surgery Department, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Elie SaghbiniOrthopedic Surgery Department, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ibrahim SalibaOrthopedic Surgery Department, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Aline KhazzakaFaculty of Medicine, Saimt-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Maroun RizkallahOrthopedic Surgery Department, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon. maroun.rizkallah@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2592-7841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Masquelet procedure proved its efficiency in treating infected nonunion filling bony gaps up to 25 cm. Yet the use of local antibiotics is still questionable in the daily practice with lack of evidence regarding its usefulness in controlling infection. An experimental rat model is put in place to study the antibacterial properties of the induced membrane produced during the first stage of Masquelet.

methodTwenty-three-month-old wistar male rats are inoculated with a 0.5 mL solution of 10^8 CFU/mL MRSA over a critical fracture done on the right femur. Six weeks later, remaining 11 rats exhibiting signs of a chronic infection with a sinus tract and oozing pus along with radiological nonunion are used for a first stage Masquelet procedure. They are randomly divided into two groups with six rats having no local antibiotic in the cement mixture and five rats having 3 g of vancomycin mixed with gentamycin loaded cement. Six weeks later (twelve weeks from baseline), all eleven rats are euthanized and blood samples for C-reactive protein are withdrawn. The induced membrane is identified and resected along with bone fragments and sent for cultures and pathology.

resultsMRSA is isolated in the cultures of all six rats in the first group where no local antibiotic was added. Altered polymorphonuclears with abscess and pus are noted on four of six pathology samples. However in the second group where local antibiotics were added, three out of five rats exhibited eradication of MRSA (p = 0.034) and all samples did not exhibit clear infection signs on pathology. A pyo-epithelioid over a foreign body reaction is seen predominantly in this group demonstrating a regenerative process. DISCUSSION: The induced membrane does not have antimicrobial properties capable of overcoming an infected nonunion on its own. When local antibiotics were added during the first stage of the Masquelet procedure, new bone formation occurred indicating the need to control an infection in order for bone union to occur.

conclusionLocal antibiotics use in adjunction to extensive debridement is advisable during the first stage of a Masquelet procedure for an infected nonunion.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAdministration, TopicalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsBone TransplantationChronic DiseaseDebridementDisease Models, AnimalFemoral FracturesFemurFracture HealingFractures, UnunitedGentamicinsMaleMembranesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsGentamicinsPolymethyl MethacrylateVancomycinAntibioticsInduced membraneInfected nonunionMasquelet procedureRat model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.