Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796933›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2019

Visualizing structure and transitions in high-dimensional biological data.

Kevin R Moon, David van Dijk, Zheng Wang, Scott Gigante, Daniel B Burkhardt, William S Chen, Kristina Yim, Antonia van den Elzen, Matthew J Hirn, Ronald R Coifman and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 549 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
549citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

549 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. CD200Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

489 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin R Moon *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
David van Dijk *Cardiovascular Research Center, section Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-9925
Zheng Wang *School of Basic Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Scott Gigante *Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4544-2764
Daniel B BurkhardtDepartment of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7744-1363
William S ChenDepartment of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kristina YimDepartment of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Antonia van den ElzenDepartment of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Matthew J HirnDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0290-4292
Ronald R CoifmanApplied Mathematics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Natalia B IvanovaDepartment of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. natalia.ivanova@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-6247
Guy WolfDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada. guy.wolf@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6740-059X
Smita KrishnaswamyDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. smita.krishnaswamy@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-1985
Yale University · USMichigan State University · USMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute · CAQingdao University · CNUniversity of Georgia · USUtah State University · US

Funding

GENETICS AND GENOMICS OF HUMAN DISEASET32HD007149 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI James P Noonan · 1985 to 2026
$8.2M
Novel differentiation repressor module in human ES cellsR01GM107092 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI IVANOVA, NATALIA B · 2014 to 2022
$2.6M
Deciphering Genetic and Epigenetic Regulatory Logic of Germ Layer Differentiation with Manifold LearningR01GM130847 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRISHNASWAMY, SMITA · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Epigenetic control of the pluripotent state by chromatin-associated factor Dppa2R01GM105772 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI IVANOVA, NATALIA B · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Finding emergent structure in multi-sample biological data with the dual geometry of cells and features R01GM135929 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, EDWARD · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
EFFICIENT SPECTRAL APPROACHES FOR FINDING UNDERLYING STRUCTURES IN BIG DATAR01HG008383 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KLUGER, YUVAL · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
Single-cell gene expression dynamics during neurogenesisF31HD097958 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BURKHARDT, DANIEL · 2019 to 2021
$83k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008383NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD097958NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007149NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105772NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107092NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130847NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high-dimensional data created by high-throughput technologies require visualization tools that reveal data structure and patterns in an intuitive form. We present PHATE, a visualization method that captures both local and global nonlinear structure using an information-geometric distance between data points. We compare PHATE to other tools on a variety of artificial and biological datasets, and find that it consistently preserves a range of patterns in data, including continual progressions, branches and clusters, better than other tools. We define a manifold preservation metric, which we call denoised embedding manifold preservation (DEMaP), and show that PHATE produces lower-dimensional embeddings that are quantitatively better denoised as compared to existing visualization methods. An analysis of a newly generated single-cell RNA sequencing dataset on human germ-layer differentiation demonstrates how PHATE reveals unique biological insight into the main developmental branches, including identification of three previously undescribed subpopulations. We also show that PHATE is applicable to a wide variety of data types, including mass cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, Hi-C and gut microbiome data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBig DataCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31796933
PMCPMC7073148
OpenAlexW2993894543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.