Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796879›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

The modulation of event-related alpha rhythm during the time course of anticipation.

Marie Simonet, Hadj Boumediene Meziane, Oliver Richard Runswick, Jamie Stephen North, Andrew Mark Williams, Jérôme Barral, André Roca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie SimonetInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. marie.simonet@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-7264
Hadj Boumediene MezianeInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-5016
Oliver Richard RunswickInstitute of Sport, University of Chichester, Chichester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-9059
Jamie Stephen NorthExpert Performance and Skill Acquisition Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Health, and Applied Science, St Mary's University, Twickenham, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-4552
Andrew Mark WilliamsDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jérôme BarralInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
André RocaExpert Performance and Skill Acquisition Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Health, and Applied Science, St Mary's University, Twickenham, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7038-1230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticipation is the ability to accurately predict future actions or events ahead of the act itself. When attempting to anticipate, researchers have identified that at least two broad sources of information are used: contextual information relating to the situation in question; and biological motion from postural cues. However, the neural correlates associated with the processing of these different sources of information across groups varying in expertise has yet to be examined empirically. We compared anticipation performance and electrophysiological activity in groups of expert (n = 12) and novice (n = 15) performers using a video-based task. Participants made anticipation judgements after being presented information under three conditions: contextual information only; kinematic information only; and both sources of information combined. The experts responded more accurately across all three conditions. Stronger alpha event-related desynchronization over occipital and frontocentral sites occurred in experts compared to the novices when anticipating. The experts relied on stronger preparatory attentional mechanisms when they processed contextual information. When kinematic information was available, the domain specific motor representations built up over many years of practice likely underpinned expertise. Our findings have implications for those interested in identifying and subsequently, enhancing the neural mechanisms involved in anticipation.

Indexed as

AdultAlpha RhythmAnticipation, PsychologicalAthletesCricket SportElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31796879
PMCPMC6890640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.