Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796807›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Schinus terebinthifolia leaf lectin (SteLL) has anti-infective action and modulates the response of Staphylococcus aureus-infected macrophages.

Isana Maria de Souza Feitosa Lima, Adrielle Zagmignan, Deivid Martins Santos, Hermerson Sousa Maia, Lucas Dos Santos Silva, Brenda da Silva Cutrim, Silvamara Leite Vieira, Clovis Macêdo Bezerra Filho, Eduardo Martins de Sousa, Thiago Henrique Napoleão and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Lectin fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. The Anxiolytic Activity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Isana Maria de Souza Feitosa LimaProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Adrielle ZagmignanProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Deivid Martins SantosProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Hermerson Sousa MaiaProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Lucas Dos Santos SilvaProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Brenda da Silva CutrimProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Silvamara Leite VieiraProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Clovis Macêdo Bezerra FilhoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Eduardo Martins de SousaProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Thiago Henrique NapoleãoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Karen Angeliki KrogfeltDepartment of Viral and Microbial Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-3453
Anders Løbner-OlesenDepartment of Biology, Section for Functional Genomics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patrícia Maria Guedes PaivaDepartamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Luís Cláudio Nascimento da SilvaProgramas de Pós-Graduação, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. luiscn.silva@ceuma.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4206-0904
Universidade Ceuma · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRStatens Serum Institut · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is recognized as an important pathogen causing a wide spectrum of diseases. Here we examined the antimicrobial effects of the lectin isolated from leaves of Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi (SteLL) against S. aureus using in vitro assays and an infection model based on Galleria mellonella larvae. The actions of SteLL on mice macrophages and S. aureus-infected macrophages were also evaluated. SteLL at 16 µg/mL (8 × MIC) increased cell mass and DNA content of S. aureus in relation to untreated bacteria, suggesting that SteLL impairs cell division. Unlike ciprofloxacin, SteLL did not induce the expression of recA, crucial for DNA repair through SOS response. The antimicrobial action of SteLL was partially inhibited by 50 mM N-acetylglucosamine. SteLL reduced staphyloxathin production and increased ciprofloxacin activity towards S. aureus. This lectin also improved the survival of G. mellonella larvae infected with S. aureus. Furthermore, SteLL induced the release of cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, and TNF-α), nitric oxide and superoxide anion by macrophagens. The lectin improved the bactericidal action of macrophages towards S. aureus; while the expression of IL-17A and IFN-γ was downregulated in infected macrophages. These evidences suggest SteLL as important lead molecule in the development of anti-infective agents against S. aureus.

Indexed as

AnacardiaceaeAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinCytokinesFemaleLectinsMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNitric OxidePlant LeavesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSuperoxidesAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinCytokinesLectinsNitric OxideSuperoxides

Identifiers

PMID31796807
PMCPMC6890730
OpenAlexW2992990537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.