Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796780›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Variations in terrestrial arthropod DNA metabarcoding methods recovers robust beta diversity but variable richness and site indicators.

Teresita M Porter, Dave M Morris, Nathan Basiliko, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Daniel Doucet, Susan Bowman, Erik J S Emilson, Caroline E Emilson, Derek Chartrand, Kerrie Wainio-Keizer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Teresita M PorterGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada. terrimporter@gmail.com.
Dave M MorrisMinistry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, ON, P7E 2V6, Canada.
Nathan BasilikoLaurentian University, Department of Biology and the Vale Living with Lakes Centre, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Mehrdad HajibabaeiBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Centre for Biodiversity Genomics & Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Daniel DoucetGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
Susan BowmanGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
Erik J S EmilsonGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
Caroline E EmilsonGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
Derek ChartrandGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
Kerrie Wainio-KeizerGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
Armand SéguinLaurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Québec, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada.
Lisa VenierGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrestrial arthropod fauna have been suggested as a key indicator of ecological integrity in forest systems. Because phenotypic identification is expert-limited, a shift towards DNA metabarcoding could improve scalability and democratize the use of forest floor arthropods for biomonitoring applications. The objective of this study was to establish the level of field sampling and DNA extraction replication needed for arthropod biodiversity assessments from soil. Processing 15 individually collected soil samples recovered significantly higher median richness (488-614 sequence variants) than pooling the same number of samples (165-191 sequence variants) prior to DNA extraction, and we found no significant richness differences when using 1 or 3 pooled DNA extractions. Beta diversity was robust to changes in methodological regimes. Though our ability to identify taxa to species rank was limited, we were able to use arthropod COI metabarcodes from forest soil to assess richness, distinguish among sites, and recover site indicators based on unnamed exact sequence variants. Our results highlight the need to continue DNA barcoding local taxa during COI metabarcoding studies to help build reference databases. All together, these sampling considerations support the use of soil arthropod COI metabarcoding as a scalable method for biomonitoring.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsArthropodsDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicForestsGenetic VariationSequence Analysis, DNASoilDNASoil

Identifiers

PMID31796780
PMCPMC6890670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.