Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796479›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Storytelling as a research tool and intervention around public health perceptions and behaviour: a protocol for a systematic narrative review.

Becky McCall, Laura Shallcross, Michael Wilson, Christopher Fuller, Andrew Hayward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
39.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pilot Testing Digital Stories to Influence College Men's Intentions to Vaccinate Against HPV.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling.Frontiers in health services · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Becky McCallInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK becky.mccall.18@ucl.ac.uk.
Laura ShallcrossInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Michael WilsonSchool of the Arts, English and Drama, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, UK.
Christopher FullerInstitute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK.
Andrew HaywardInstitute of Epidemiology and Health, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBLoughborough University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2016-16-007MRF_ MRF-145-0004-TPG-AVISO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a growing trend to use storytelling as a research tool to extract information and/or as an intervention to effect change in the public knowledge, attitudes and behaviour (KAB) in relation to public health issues, primarily those with a strong element of disease prevention. However, evidence of its use in either or both capacities is limited. This protocol proposes a systematic narrative review of peer-reviewed, published literature on the use of storytelling as a research tool within the public health arena. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center), Web of Science, Art and Humanities database (ProQuest), Scopus and Google Scholar will be searched for studies that look at the use of storytelling in the research of pressing current public health issues, for example, vaccinations, antimicrobial resistance, climate change and cancer screening. The review will synthesise evidence of how storytelling is used as a research tool to (a) gain insights into KAB and (b) to effect change in KAB when used as an intervention. Included studies will be selected according to carefully defined criteria relevant to public health issues of interest, and data from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies will be extracted with a customised data extraction form. A narrative synthesis will be performed according to Economic and Social Research Council guidance from Popay, J, 2006.The study protocol follows the recommendations by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required for this study, as no primary data will be collected. Dissemination will involve publishing results of this study in relevant peer-reviewed journal(s). Where possible, the study results will also be presented as posters or talks at relevant medical conferences and meetings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124704.

Indexed as

Systematic Reviews as TopicConsumer Health InformaticsHealth EducationHumansInformation DisseminationPatient Education as TopicPrimary PreventionPublic HealthQualitative Researchattitudesbehaviourperceptionpublic healthstorytelling

Identifiers

PMID31796479
PMCPMC6924770
OpenAlexW2991660062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.