ArticleBMJ open2019
Storytelling as a research tool and intervention around public health perceptions and behaviour: a protocol for a systematic narrative review.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lessons Learned: Why Motivational Interviewing Should Be Adapted to Socio-Cultural Contexts.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Pilot Testing Digital Stories to Influence College Men's Intentions to Vaccinate Against HPV.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Review
- Community-engaged implementation of a safety bundle for pregnancy-related severe hypertension in the outpatient setting: protocol for a type 3 hybrid study with a multiple baseline design.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Time for health change: promoting community-based diabetes screening and prevention with video vignettes and social marketing.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Food access narratives as told by consumers and retailers engaging in a COVID-19-stricken urban food system: A brief report.Journal of public health research · 2023Article
- Making microbes matter: storytelling's potential to make antibiotic resistance real and relevant to the public.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2023Article
- Regaining creativity in science: insights from conversation.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Pause, re-think, go virtual … pandemic adaptations from 20 diverse mental health promotion intervention projects across Canada.Mental health & prevention · 2022Article
- Impulsivity assessed ten years earlier and sociodemographic factors predict adherence to COVID-19 related behavioral restrictions in old individuals with hypertension.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.Ethnicity & disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is a growing trend to use storytelling as a research tool to extract information and/or as an intervention to effect change in the public knowledge, attitudes and behaviour (KAB) in relation to public health issues, primarily those with a strong element of disease prevention. However, evidence of its use in either or both capacities is limited. This protocol proposes a systematic narrative review of peer-reviewed, published literature on the use of storytelling as a research tool within the public health arena. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center), Web of Science, Art and Humanities database (ProQuest), Scopus and Google Scholar will be searched for studies that look at the use of storytelling in the research of pressing current public health issues, for example, vaccinations, antimicrobial resistance, climate change and cancer screening. The review will synthesise evidence of how storytelling is used as a research tool to (a) gain insights into KAB and (b) to effect change in KAB when used as an intervention. Included studies will be selected according to carefully defined criteria relevant to public health issues of interest, and data from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies will be extracted with a customised data extraction form. A narrative synthesis will be performed according to Economic and Social Research Council guidance from Popay, J, 2006.The study protocol follows the recommendations by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required for this study, as no primary data will be collected. Dissemination will involve publishing results of this study in relevant peer-reviewed journal(s). Where possible, the study results will also be presented as posters or talks at relevant medical conferences and meetings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124704.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.