Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796144›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Socio-economic and racial prenatal diet quality disparities in a national US sample.

Haley W Parker, Alison Tovar, Karen McCurdy, Maya Vadiveloo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haley W ParkerDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4824-9553
Alison TovarDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1559-592X
Karen McCurdyDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Maya VadivelooDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-670X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine differences in prenatal diet quality by socio-economic status (SES) and race/ethnicity.

designA secondary, cross-sectional analysis. Race and SES were self-reported prenatally; SES was categorized into four groups: high-income, middle-income and low-income WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children) participant/non-participant. The Alternative Healthy Eating Index for Pregnancy (AHEI-P) measured diet quality, including four moderation and nine adequacy components (higher scores = healthier diet). Generalized linear models adjusted for covariates and post hoc testing with Tukey adjustment compared AHEI-P scores between groups, using a threshold of P < 0·05.

settingInfant Feeding Practices Study II, conducted in a national US convenience cohort.

participantsWomen in their third trimester (n 1322) with dietary history.

resultsParticipants were of 28·9 (se 5·6) years on average and predominantly non-Hispanic White (84 %); approximately one-third participated in WIC and 17 % were high-income. The mean AHEI-P score was 61·7 (se 10·8) of 130 points. High-income women had higher total (62·4 (se 1·0)) and moderation component AHEI-P scores than middle-income (60·1 (se 0·8), P = 0·02), low-income WIC participants (58·3 (se 0·8), P < 0·0001) and non-participants (58·9 (se 0·9), P = 0·001). Non-Hispanic Black participants had lower total (57·8 (se 1·4)) and adequacy scores than Other races (i.e. neither non-Hispanic Black nor White, 62·1 (se 0·9), P = 0·02).

conclusionsDisparities in prenatal diet quality were observed, with non-Hispanic Black women, low-/middle-income and WIC participants having lower diet quality. However, interventions are needed to improve prenatal diet quality broadly among US women.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesDietEthnicityFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood AssistanceHumansIncomeInfantLinear ModelsPovertyPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdAlternative Healthy Eating Index for PregnancyInfant Feeding Practices Study IIPrenatal diet qualityRaceSocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID31796144
PMCPMC10200547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.