Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796055›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2019

Potential factors contributing to the poor antimicrobial efficacy of SAAP-148 in a rat wound infection model.

Gabrielle S Dijksteel, Magda M W Ulrich, Marcel Vlig, Peter H Nibbering, Robert A Cordfunke, Jan W Drijfhout, Esther Middelkoop, Bouke K H L Boekema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. AntiZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabrielle S DijksteelAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands. gdijksteel@burns.nl.
Magda M W UlrichAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Marcel VligAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Peter H NibberingDept. of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert A CordfunkeDept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan W DrijfhoutDept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Esther MiddelkoopAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Bouke K H L BoekemaAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

Funding

Ministry of Economic Affairs through the public-private partnership (PPP) allowance made available by Health-Holland, Top Sector life Sciences & Health as well as by a contribution from the Dutch Burns Foundation LSH-TKI40-43100-98-017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the efficacy of a synthetic antimicrobial peptide SAAP-148, which was shown to be effective against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on tape-stripped mice skin. Unexpectedly, SAAP-148 was not effective against MRSA in our pilot study using rats with excision wounds. Therefore, we investigated factors that might have contributed to the poor efficacy of SAAP-148. Subsequently, we optimised the protocol and assessed the efficacy of SAAP-148 in an adapted rat study.

methodsWe incubated 100 µL of SAAP-148 with 1 cm

resultsContrary to Cuticell, Parafilm and Tegaderm film, < 20% of peptide solution was recovered after incubation with gauze, Mepilex border and Opsite Post-op. Furthermore, in plasma, eschar- or skin extract > 20-fold higher dosages of SAAP-148 were required to achieve a 2-log reduction (LR) of MRSA versus SAAP-148 in PBS. Exposure of ex vivo models to SAAP-148 for 24 h resulted in a 4-fold lower LR than a 1 h or 4 h exposure period. Additionally, SAAP-148 caused a 1.3-fold lower mean LR at a load of 10

conclusionsSeveral factors, such as absorption of SAAP-148 by wound dressings, components within wound exudates, re-colonisation during the exposure of SAAP-148, and a high bacterial load may contribute to the poor antimicrobial effect of SAAP-148 against MRSA in the rat model.

Indexed as

Wound InfectionAdministration, TopicalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPilot ProjectsRatsSkinStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSynthetic DrugsAnti-Bacterial AgentsSynthetic DrugsAntimicrobial peptidesEfficacyMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusSAAP-148Skin and soft tissue infectionsTopical therapy

Identifiers

PMID31796055
PMCPMC6891976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.