Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31796008›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

The Therapeutic Engagement Questionnaire (TEQ): a service user-focused mental health nursing outcome metric.

Mary Chambers, Sue McAndrew, Fiona Nolan, Ben Thomas, Paul Watts, Robert Grant, Xenya Kantaris

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary ChambersFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, St George's Campus, 6th Floor Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK. M.Chambers@sgul.kingston.ac.uk.
Sue McAndrewSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.
Fiona NolanCamden and Islington NHS Foundation/University College London, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, 1-19, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Ben ThomasDepartment of Health, Strategy and External Relations Directorate, 79 Whitehall, London, SW1A 2NS, UK.
Paul WattsSomerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Community Mental Health Nursing, 2nd Floor Mallard Court, Express Park, Bristol Road, Bristol, TA4 4RN, UK.
Robert GrantFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, St George's Campus, 6th Floor Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Xenya KantarisFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, St George's Campus, 6th Floor Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK. X.Kantaris@sgul.kingston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-4626

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic engagement (TE) has been described as the crux of mental health nursing but despite its perceived importance, to date, there is no measurement tool that captures it. As a result, there is no way of determining the contribution of mental health nursing interaction to service user recovery, in acute inpatient mental health settings or the wider care quality agenda.

methodsTo develop and validate a TE measurement tool in partnership with Service Users (SUs) and Registered Mental Health Nurses (RMHNs). The TEQ was developed in 3 stages: 1) item generation (and pre-testing), 2) item reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and 3) validation across Mental Health Trusts in England.

resultsThe final questionnaire has two versions, (SU and RMHN version), each scored within two contexts (1-1 SU-RMHN interactions and overall environment and atmosphere of the ward) and includes 20 items with two sub-scales (care interactions and care delivery). Psychometric evaluation of the TEQ shows high inter-scale correlations (0.66-0.95 SU; 0.57-0.90 RMHN), sound sub-scale internal consistency (> 0.95), concurrent validity (> 0.60) and adequate score variability for both versions of the TEQ. In summary, the TEQ behaves well as a measurement tool.

conclusionsThe TEQ can determine the collaborative and empathic nature of RMHN-SU interactions, capture if SUs are treated with dignity and respect and recognise that the principles of the recovery approach are being respected. The TEQ can also provide robust monitoring of nursing activity, offer opportunity for transparency of activity, feed into healthcare organizations' key performance indicators and provide reassurance about the nature and quality of nurses' work.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedEmpathyEnglandFemaleHospitalsHumansInpatientsMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPsychiatric NursingPsychometricsQuality of Health CareMental Health NursingRegistered Mental Health NursesService UsersTherapeutic Engagement

Identifiers

PMID31796008
PMCPMC6892151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.