ArticleBMC cancer2019
Biological treatment of pediatric sarcomas by combined virotherapy and NK cell therapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncolytic Maraba Virus MG1 Mediates Direct and Natural Killer Cell-Dependent Lysis of Ewing Sarcoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Enhancing cancer therapy: the integration of oncolytic virus therapy with diverse treatments.Cancer cell international · 2024Review
- Improvement of histone deacetylase inhibitor efficacy by SN38 through TWIST1 suppression in synovial sarcoma.Cancer innovation · 2024Article
- Review
- Multi-modal efficacy of a chimeric vesiculovirus expressing the Morreton glycoprotein in sarcoma.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Article
- A vector-encoded bispecific killer engager to harness virus-activated NK cells as anti-tumor effectors.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- Oncolytic viruses-modulated immunogenic cell death, apoptosis and autophagy linking to virotherapy and cancer immune response.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Immunovirotherapy for Pediatric Solid Tumors: A Promising Treatment That is Becoming a Reality.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Immunotherapy in soft tissue and bone sarcoma: unraveling the barriers to effectiveness.Theranostics · 2022Review
- Review
- Virotherapy in Germany-Recent Activities in Virus Engineering, Preclinical Development, and Clinical Studies.Viruses · 2021Review
- Measles Virus as an Oncolytic Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2021Review
- Review
- Natural Killer Cells: The Linchpin for Successful Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Prospects for NK Cell Therapy of Sarcoma.Cancers · 2020Review
- Engineering and combining oncolytic measles virus for cancer therapy.Cytokine & growth factor reviews · 2020Review
- Improving antitumor efficacy via combinatorial regimens of oncolytic virotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn pediatric sarcomas, outcomes of established therapies still remain poor, especially due to high-grade resistances to chemotherapeutic compounds. Taking novel biological approaches into account, virotherapy was found to be efficient in many pediatric sarcoma types. Also NK cell therapy was denoted to represent a promising upcoming strategy for pediatric sarcoma patients. We here investigated a combinatorial approach employing oncolytic measles vaccine virotherapeutics (MeV) together with activated human NK cells (or PBMCs).
methodsThe human sarcoma cell lines A673 and HT1080 were used to evaluate the efficacy of this combinatorial treatment modality. Oncolysis was determined by measuring real-time cell proliferation using the xCELLigence RTCA SP system. Furthermore, expression of receptors on NK cells and the respective ligands on A673 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. To measure the protein release of activated NK cells a LEGENDplex™ assay was performed.
resultsMonotherapy with MeV led to a time- and dose-dependent oncolytic reduction of A673 and HT1080 sarcoma tumor cell masses. Concurrently, such MeV infections did not change the expression of NK cell ligands MICA/B, ULBP1, 2, and 3, CD112, and CD155. As shown by real-time proliferation assays, infections of A673 and HT1080 sarcoma cells with MeV followed by co-culture with activated NK cells or PBMCs led to enhanced sarcoma cell destruction when compared to the respective monotherapies. In parallel, this dual therapy resulted in an increased release of granzymes, perforin, and granulysin from NK cells. In contrast, expression of activation and ontogenesis receptors on NK cells was not found to be altered after co-culture with MeV-infected A673 sarcoma cells.
conclusionsTaken together, the combined treatment strategy comprising oncolytic MeV and activated NK cells resulted in enhanced oncolysis of A673 and HT1080 cells when compared to the respective monotherapies. In parallel, we observed an increased release of NK cell activation markers upon co-culture with MeV-infected A673 human sarcoma cells. These results support the onset of clinical trials combining oncolytic virotherapy with NK cell based immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.