Trial reportStroke2020
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: An Alternative Primary Outcome Measure for Trials of Acute Treatment for Ischemic Stroke.
Trial report in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00359424 (Interventional Management of Stroke Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 118 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventional Management of Stroke Trial (IMS III): A Phase III Clinical Trial Examining Whether a Combined Intravenous (IV) and Intra-Arterial (IA) Approach to Recanalization is Superior to Standard IV Rt-PA (Activase®) Alone
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Early neurological deterioration as a predictor of outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Xingnaojing Injection for Emergency Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy evaluation of Buyang Huanwu Decoction in the treatment of ischemic stroke in the recovery period: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Stem Cell-Based Therapies via Different Administration Route for Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.Cell transplantationPooled it
- Trial
- Early neurological improvement with deferoxamine after intracerebral hemorrhage: A post hoc analysis of the i-DEF trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Trial
- Validity of Early Outcomes as Indicators for Comparing Hospitals on Quality of Stroke Care.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- A Hierarchical Multi-Dimensional Cognitive Training Program for Preventive Cognitive Decline in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Trial
- Time Since Stroke Onset, Quantitative Collateral Score, and Functional Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Neurology · 2022Trial
- Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (TRACE): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) controlled phase II study.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2022Trial
- Deep Learning-Based Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Ischemic Penumbra in Early Cerebral Infarction.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Trial
- Xingnao Kaiqiao Acupuncture Method Combined with Temporal Three-Needle in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Trial
- Multiple overlapping stent-assisted coiling improves efficacy and safety of treatment for complex intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Trial
- Assessing Outcome of tPA Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (0-three hours).Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of the Day 5-7 Neurological Examination in Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MARVEL Trial.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- The significance of the WHO/ISH absolute cardiovascular risk prediction scores among recent stroke survivors in Ghana-Insights from the PINGS2 multicenter study.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Standardisation in acute stroke research: A scoping review of upper limb assessments against Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR) benchmarks.Clinical rehabilitation · 2026Article
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose- The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months is the most commonly used primary outcome measure in stroke treatment trials, but it lacks specificity and requires long-term follow-up interviews, which consume time and resources. An alternative may be the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), early after stroke. Our aim was to evaluate whether the NIHSS assessed within 1 week after treatment could serve as a primary outcome measure for trials of acute treatment for ischemic stroke. Methods- We used data from 2 randomized controlled trials of endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke: the positive MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands; N=500) and the neutral IMS (Interventional Management of Stroke) III trial (N=656). We used a causal mediation model, with linear and ordinal logistic regression adjusted for confounders, to evaluate the NIHSS 24 hours and 5 to 7 days after endovascular treatment as primary outcome measures (instead of the mRS at 3 months) in both trials. Patients who had died before the NIHSS was assessed received the maximum score of 42. NIHSS+1 was then log10-transformed. Results- In both trials, there was a significant correlation between the NIHSS at 24 hours and 5 to 7 days and the mRS. In MR CLEAN, we found a significant effect of endovascular treatment on the mRS and on the NIHSS at 24 hours and 5 to 7 days. After adjustment for NIHSS at 24 hours and 5 to 7 days, the effect of endovascular treatment on the mRS decreased from common odds ratio 1.68 (95% CI, 1.22-2.32) to respectively 1.36 (95% CI, 0.97-1.91) and 1.24 (95% CI, 0.87-1.79), indicating that treatment effect on the mRS is in large part mediated by the NIHSS. In the IMS III trial there was no treatment effect on the NIHSS at 24 hours and 5 to 7 days, corresponding with the absence of a treatment effect on the mRS. Conclusions- The NIHSS within 1 week satisfies the requirements for a surrogate end point and may be used as a primary outcome measure in trials of acute treatment for ischemic stroke, particularly in phase II(b) trials. This could reduce stroke-outcome assessment to its essentials (ie, neurological deficit), and reduce trial duration and costs. Whether and under which conditions it could be used in phase III trials requires a debate in the field with all parties. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00359424.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.