Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795848›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Single-cell visualization indicates direct role of sponge host in uptake of dissolved organic matter.

Michelle Achlatis, Mathieu Pernice, Kathryn Green, Jasper M de Goeij, Paul Guagliardo, Matthew R Kilburn, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Sophie Dove

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The architecture of sponge choanocyte chambers is well adapted to mechanical pumping functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. The chromosomal genome sequence of the spongeWellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle AchlatisSchool of Biological Sciences, Coral Reef Ecosystems Laboratory, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Mathieu PerniceFaculty of Science, Climate Change Cluster (C3), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2007, Australia.
Kathryn GreenCentre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Jasper M de GoeijDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul GuagliardoCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Matthew R KilburnCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Ove Hoegh-GuldbergSchool of Biological Sciences, Coral Reef Ecosystems Laboratory, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Sophie DoveSchool of Biological Sciences, Coral Reef Ecosystems Laboratory, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Australian Research Council · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine sponges are set to become more abundant in many near-future oligotrophic environments, where they play crucial roles in nutrient cycling. Of high importance is their mass turnover of dissolved organic matter (DOM), a heterogeneous mixture that constitutes the largest fraction of organic matter in the ocean and is recycled primarily by bacterial mediation. Little is known, however, about the mechanism that enables sponges to incorporate large quantities of DOM in their nutrition, unlike most other invertebrates. Here, we examine the cellular capacity for direct processing of DOM, and the fate of the processed matter, inside a dinoflagellate-hosting bioeroding sponge that is prominent on Indo-Pacific coral reefs. Integrating transmission electron microscopy with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry, we track

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsCoral ReefsDinoflagellidaNitrogenPoriferaNitrogenCliona bioerosiondissolved organic matterNanoSIMSsponge loopstable isotopesSymbiodiniaceae

Identifiers

PMID31795848
PMCPMC6939258
OpenAlexW2992282209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.