Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795832›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group2019

In-situ vaccination using focused ultrasound heating and anti-CD-40 agonistic antibody enhances T-cell mediated local and abscopal effects in murine melanoma.

Mohit Pratap Singh, Sri Nandhini Sethuraman, Jerry Ritchey, Steven Fiering, Chandan Guha, Jerry Malayer, Ashish Ranjan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohit Pratap SinghCenter for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Sri Nandhini SethuramanCenter for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Jerry RitcheyCenter for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Steven FieringGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Chandan GuhaAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jerry MalayerCenter for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Ashish RanjanCenter for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Oklahoma State University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Novel focused ultrasound enhanced calreticulin-nanoparticle for immune primed melanoma immunotherapyR37CA239150 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI RANJAN, ASHISH · 2019 to 2025
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R37 CA239150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of melanoma immunotherapy is dependent on the presence of activated and functional T-cells in tumors. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of local-focused ultrasound (FUS) heating (∼42-45 °C) and in-situ anti-CD-40 agonistic antibody in enhancing T-cell function for melanoma immunotherapy. We compared the following groups of mice with bilateral flank B16 F10 melanoma: (1) Control, (2) FUS, (3) CD-40, and (4) CD-40 + FUS (FUS40). FUS heating was applied for ∼15 min in right flank tumor, and intratumoral injections of CD-40 were performed sequentially within 4 h. A total of 3 FUS and 4 anti-CD-40 treatments were administered unilaterally 3 days apart. Mice were sacrificed 30 days post-inoculation, and the treated tumor and spleen tissues were profiled for T-cell function and macrophage polarization. Compared to all other groups, histology and flow cytometry showed that FUS40 increased the population of tumor-specific CD-4+ and CD-8+ T cells rich in Granzyme B+, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IFN-γ production and poor in PD-1 expression. In addition, FUS40 promoted the infiltration of tumor-suppressing M1 phenotype macrophages in the treated mice. The resultant immune-enhancing effects of FUS40 suppressed B16 melanoma growth at the treated site by 2-3-folds compared to control, FUS, and CD-40, and also achieved significant abscopal effects in untreated tumors relative to CD40 alone. Additionally, the local FUS40 prevented adverse liver toxicities in the treated mice. Our study suggests that combined FUS and CD-40 can enhance T-cell and macrophage functions to aid effective melanoma immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD40 AntigensDisease Models, AnimalHeatingImmunophenotypingImmunotherapyMelanomaMiceVaccinationCD40 AntigensCD-40focused ultrasoundM1 macrophagesmelanomaT-cell exhaustion

Identifiers

PMID31795832
PMCPMC6897315
OpenAlexW2992463778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.