Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795706›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Octave band noise exposure: Laboratory models and otoprotection efforts.

Sarah N Gittleman, Colleen G Le Prell, Tanisha L Hammill

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah N GittlemanSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75080, USA.
Colleen G Le PrellSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75080, USA.
Tanisha L HammillDepartment of Defense, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA.
Defense Health Agency · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

Effect of Inner Hair Cell Loss and Afferent Damage on Functional HearingR01DC014088 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI LOBARINAS, EDWARD · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in the understanding of mechanisms of noise injury, the past 30 years have brought numerous efforts to identify drugs that prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The diverse protocols used across investigations have made comparisons across drugs difficult. A systematic review of the literature by Hammill [(2017). Doctoral thesis, The University of Texas at Austin] identified original reports of chemical interventions to prevent or treat hearing loss caused by noise exposure. An initial search returned 3492 articles. After excluding duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the systematic review inclusion criteria, a total of 213 studies published between 1977 and 2016 remained. Reference information, noise exposure parameters, species, sex, method of NIHL assessment, and pharmaceutical intervention details for these 213 studies were entered into a database. Frequency-specific threshold shifts in control animals (i.e., in the absence of pharmaceutical intervention) are reported here. Specific patterns of hearing loss as a function of species and noise exposure parameters are provided to facilitate the selection of appropriate pre-clinical models. The emphasis of this report is octave band noise exposure, as this is one of the most common exposure protocols across pharmacological otoprotection studies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsChinchillaGuinea PigsHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMiceRats

Identifiers

PMID31795706
PMCPMC7195864
OpenAlexW2991634217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.