Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795668›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Colleen G Le Prell, Tanisha L Hammill, William J Murphy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Noise and Health: Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A clinical trial of nicergoline to prevent temporary threshold shift.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Colleen G Le PrellSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75080, USA.
Tanisha L HammillDepartment of Defense, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA.
William J MurphyDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinanati, Ohio 45226-1998, USA.

Funding

Effect of Inner Hair Cell Loss and Afferent Damage on Functional HearingR01DC014088 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI LOBARINAS, EDWARD · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models have been used to gain insight into the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its potential prevention using investigational new drug agents. A number of compounds have yielded benefit in pre-clinical (animal) models. However, the acute traumatic injury models commonly used in pre-clinical testing are fundamentally different from the chronic and repeated exposures experienced by many human populations. Diverse populations that are potentially at risk and could be considered for enrollment in clinical studies include service members, workers exposed to occupational noise, musicians and other performing artists, and children and young adults exposed to non-occupational (including recreational) noise. Both animal models and clinical populations were discussed in this special issue, followed by discussion of individual variation in vulnerability to NIHL. In this final contribution, study design considerations for NIHL otoprotection in pre-clinical and clinical testing are integrated and broadly discussed with evidence-based guidance offered where possible, drawing on the contributions to this special issue as well as other existing literature. The overarching goals of this final paper are to (1) review and summarize key information across contributions and (2) synthesize information to facilitate successful translation of otoprotective drugs from animal models into human application.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsEar Protective DevicesHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansNeuroprotective AgentsNoise, OccupationalNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID31795668
PMCPMC7195863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.