Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795614›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2019

Validity of Self-reported Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Korea: The Health Examinees (HEXA) Study.

Sunho Choe, Joonki Lee, Jeeyoo Lee, Daehee Kang, Jong-Koo Lee, Aesun Shin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stroke burden and associated predictors: A methodological reflection.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sunho ChoeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joonki LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jeeyoo LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Daehee KangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong-Koo LeeJW LEE Center for Global Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Aesun ShinDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

CDC HHS #2017N-E71002-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSelf-reported disease history is often used in epidemiological studies. In this study, we acquired the hospital records of subjects who self-reported stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) and evaluated the validity of the participants' self-reported disease history. We also determined the level of agreement between specialists and non-specialists.

methodsAmong the participants in the Health Examinees study, 1488 subjects self-reported stroke or MI during 2012-2017, and medical records were acquired for the 429 subjects (28.8%) who agreed to share their medical information. Each record was independently assigned to 2 medical doctors for review. The records were classified as 'definite,' 'possible,' or 'not' stroke or MI. If the doctors did not agree, a third doctor made the final decision. The positive predictive value (PPV) of self-reporting was calculated with the doctors' review as the gold standard. Kappa statistics were used to compare the results between general doctors and neurologists or cardiologists.

resultsMedical records from 208 patients with self-reported stroke and 221 patients with self-reported MI were reviewed. The PPV of self-reported disease history was 51.4% for stroke and 32.6% for MI. If cases classified as 'possible' were counted as positive diagnoses, the PPV was 59.1% for stroke and 33.5% for MI. Kappa statistics showed moderate levels of agreement between specialists and non-specialists for both stroke and MI.

conclusionsThe validity of self-reported disease was lower than expected, especially in those who reported having been diagnosed with MI. Proper consideration is needed when using these self-reported data in further studies.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRepublic of KoreaSelf ReportStrokeMyocardial infarctionPositive predictive valueSelf-reportStrokeValidity

Identifiers

PMID31795614
PMCPMC6893227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.