Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795520›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

TCGA-TCIA Impact on Radiogenomics Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.

Mario Zanfardino, Katia Pane, Peppino Mirabelli, Marco Salvatore, Monica Franzese

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario ZanfardinoIRCCS SDN, Via E. Gianturco, 113, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Katia PaneIRCCS SDN, Via E. Gianturco, 113, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Peppino MirabelliIRCCS SDN, Via E. Gianturco, 113, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Marco SalvatoreIRCCS SDN, Via E. Gianturco, 113, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Monica FranzeseIRCCS SDN, Via E. Gianturco, 113, 80143 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, the development of radiogenomics research has produced a significant amount of papers describing relations between imaging features and several molecular 'omic signatures arising from next-generation sequencing technology and their potential role in the integrated diagnostic field. The most vulnerable point of many of these studies lies in the poor number of involved patients. In this scenario, a leading role is played by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), which make available, respectively, molecular 'omic data and linked imaging data. In this review, we systematically collected and analyzed radiogenomic studies based on TCGA-TCIA data. We organized literature per tumor type and molecular 'omic data in order to discuss salient imaging genomic associations and limitations of each study. Finally, we outlined the potential clinical impact of radiogenomics to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and the prediction of patient outcomes in oncology.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, NeoplasmGenomicsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyTranscriptomecancer diagnosisgenomicsradiogenomicsradiomicsTCGATCIA

Identifiers

PMID31795520
PMCPMC6929079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.