Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795466›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Recent Advances in Mono- and Combined Stem Cell Therapies of Stroke in Animal Models and Humans.

Roxana Surugiu, Andrei Olaru, Dirk M Hermann, Daniela Glavan, Bogdan Catalin, Aurel Popa-Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Innovative approaches for the treatment of stroke: a recent update.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Stem Cell- and Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. CD271Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roxana SurugiuCenter of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 20049 Craiova, Romania.
Andrei OlaruDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 20049 Craiova, Romania.
Dirk M HermannChair of Vascular Neurology, Dementia and Ageing Research, Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Daniela GlavanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 20049 Craiova, Romania.
Bogdan CatalinExperimental Research Centre for Normal and Pathological Aging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 20049 Craiova, Romania.
Aurel Popa-WagnerChair of Vascular Neurology, Dementia and Ageing Research, Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROEssen University Hospital · DEGriffith University · AU

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 667302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the failure of acute neuroprotection therapies, major efforts are currently made worldwide to promote neurological recovery and brain plasticity in the subacute and post-acute phases of stroke. Currently, there is hope that stroke recovery might be promoted by cell-based therapies. The field of stem cell therapy for cerebral ischemia has made significant progress in the last five years. A variety of stem cells have been tested in animal models and humans including adipose stem cells, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, human amnion epithelial cells, human placenta amniotic membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells, adult human pluripotent-like olfactory stem cells, human bone marrow endothelial progenitor cells, electrically-stimulated human neuronal progenitor cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of human origin. Combination therapies in animal models include a mix of two or more therapeutic factors consisting of bone marrow stromal cells, exercise and thyroid hormones, endothelial progenitor cells overexpressing the chemokine CXCL12. Mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of transplanted cells include the "bystander" effects, paracrine mechanisms, or extracellular vesicles-mediated restorative effects. Mitochondria transfer also appears to be a powerful strategy for regenerative processes. Studies in humans are currently limited to a small number of studies using autologous stem cells mainly aimed to assess tolerability and side-effects of human stem cells in the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaCell SeparationDisease Models, AnimalExercise TherapyHumansStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationStrokeThyroid HormonesThyroid Hormonesagingcerebral ischemiahuman stem cellsrestorative therapiesrodent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31795466
PMCPMC6928803
OpenAlexW2991020566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.