Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795438›Full record

ArticleVaccines2019

Assessing Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Italian Paediatric Hospital and the Development of a Healthcare Worker's Vaccination Compliance Index.

Sonia Paoli, Chiara Lorini, Francesco Puggelli, Antonino Sala, Maddalena Grazzini, Diana Paolini, Paolo Bonanni, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonia PaoliDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Chiara LoriniDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Francesco PuggelliDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Antonino SalaManagement Department, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Viale Gaetano Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Maddalena GrazziniDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Diana PaoliniDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Paolo BonanniDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Guglielmo BonaccorsiDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) in paediatric hospitals are an important source of advice on vaccinations, but vaccine hesitancy can affect even these professionals. The aim of this study is to assess this phenomenon, measuring it by means of a scoring system. A survey was conducted in five departments of an Italian paediatric university hospital of national interest. Vaccination against influenza was considered a behavioral indicator of vaccination uptake. Using the collected data, the healthcare worker's vaccination compliance index (HVCI) was computed. The results demonstrate statistically significant differences between departments and professional profiles. Nearly 80% of the sample was not immunized against seasonal influenza. According to the HVCI scores, the most hesitant departments are the intensive care unit, emergency room, and oncohematology department, while the most hesitant professional profiles are nurses and auxiliary staff. The score of the unvaccinated is significantly lower than that of the vaccinated, and the same difference was found between those who self-perceive to be skilled versus unskilled. The HVCI score was statistically verified as a predictive parameter to assess vaccination against seasonal influenza. By means of strategic training policies, both HVCI and perceived skills could be improved, suggesting that hospital management should draw a complex intervention program to fight against hesitancy.

Indexed as

Healthcare workers (HCWs), Vaccine Confidence IndexItalypaediatricsvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID31795438
PMCPMC6963296
OpenAlexW2991050099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.