ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2019
The Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms on Automatic Pulmonary Nodule Detection and Classification Tested on Different Datasets That Are Not Derived from LIDC-IDRI: A Systematic Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Construction and validation of a prediction model for malignant pulmonary nodules based on imaging, demographic, and laboratory features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Establishing an AI-based diagnostic framework for pulmonary nodules in computed tomography.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Establishing predictive models for malignant and inflammatory pulmonary nodules using clinical data and CT imaging features.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: a state-of-the-art overview of systematic reviews with methodological recommendations for improved reporting.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Precise diagnosis and prognosis assessment of malignant lung nodules: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Recommendations for the creation of benchmark datasets for reproducible artificial intelligence in radiology.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in lung cancer screening: A real-world study in a Chinese physical examination population.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Effect of emphysema on AI software and human reader performance in lung nodule detection from low-dose chest CT.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Article
- Combined model integrating deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data to classify lung nodules at chest CT.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Efficacy of exponentiation method with a convolutional neural network for classifying lung nodules on CT images by malignancy level.European radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018-2019.BJR open · 2023Review
- Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement When Using a Diagnostic Labeling Scheme for Annotating Findings on Chest X-rays-An Early Step in the Development of a Deep Learning-Based Decision Support System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Can deep learning improve image quality of low-dose CT: a prospective study in interstitial lung disease.European radiology · 2022Article
- Deep Learning Techniques to Diagnose Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Possible Bias in Supervised Deep Learning Algorithms for CT Lung Nodule Detection and Classification.Cancers · 2022Review
- A radiomics approach for lung nodule detection in thoracic CT images based on the dynamic patterns of morphological variation.European radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically review the performance of deep learning technology in detecting and classifying pulmonary nodules on computed tomography (CT) scans that were not from the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC-IDRI) database. Furthermore, we explored the difference in performance when the deep learning technology was applied to test datasets different from the training datasets. Only peer-reviewed, original research articles utilizing deep learning technology were included in this study, and only results from testing on datasets other than the LIDC-IDRI were included. We searched a total of six databases: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), Scopus, and Web of Science. This resulted in 1782 studies after duplicates were removed, and a total of 26 studies were included in this systematic review. Three studies explored the performance of pulmonary nodule detection only, 16 studies explored the performance of pulmonary nodule classification only, and 7 studies had reports of both pulmonary nodule detection and classification. Three different deep learning architectures were mentioned amongst the included studies: convolutional neural network (CNN), massive training artificial neural network (MTANN), and deep stacked denoising autoencoder extreme learning machine (SDAE-ELM). The studies reached a classification accuracy between 68-99.6% and a detection accuracy between 80.6-94%. Performance of deep learning technology in studies using different test and training datasets was comparable to studies using same type of test and training datasets. In conclusion, deep learning was able to achieve high levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and/or specificity in detecting and/or classifying nodules when applied to pulmonary CT scans not from the LIDC-IDRI database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.