Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795219›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology.

Ramon Chaves, Daniel Schneider, António Correia, Claudia L R Motta, Marcos R S Borges

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ramon ChavesPrograma de Pós Graduação em Informática, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPGI/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-590, Brazil.
Daniel SchneiderTércio Pacitti Institute of Computer Applications and Research (NCE/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-916, Brazil.
António CorreiaINESC TEC and University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Claudia L R MottaPrograma de Pós Graduação em Informática, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPGI/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-590, Brazil.
Marcos R S BorgesPrograma de Pós Graduação em Informática, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPGI/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-590, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, citizen involvement has been increasingly used in urban disaster prevention and management, taking advantage of new ubiquitous and collaborative technologies. This scenario has created a unique opportunity to leverage the work of crowds of volunteers. As a result, crowdsourcing approaches for disaster prevention and management have been proposed and evaluated. However, the articulation of citizens, tasks, and outcomes as a continuous flow of knowledge generation reveals a complex ecosystem that requires coordination efforts to manage interdependencies in crowd work. To tackle this challenging problem, this paper extends to the context of urban emergency management the results of a previous study that investigates how crowd work is managed in crowdsourcing platforms applied to urban planning. The goal is to understand how crowdsourcing techniques and quality control dimensions used in urban planning could be used to support urban emergency management, especially in the context of mining-related dam outages. Through a systematic literature review, our study makes a comparison between crowdsourcing tools designed for urban planning and urban emergency management and proposes a five-dimension typology of quality in crowdsourcing, which can be leveraged for optimizing urban planning and emergency management processes.

Indexed as

EcosystemCity PlanningHumanscrowdsourcingemergency managementquality control in crowdsourcingsystematic literature reviewtask designurban planning

Identifiers

PMID31795219
PMCPMC6928978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.