ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Identification of Soybean Seed Varieties Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging sensor technologies for seed phenotyping by genebanks.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Flaxseed protein content prediction based on hyperspectral wavelength selection with fractional order ant colony optimization.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Monitoring quality changes in green tea during storage: A hyperspectral imaging method.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning as a Nondestructive Method for Proso Millet Seed Detection and Classification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Modeling of flaxseed protein, oil content, linoleic acid, and lignan content prediction based on hyperspectral imaging.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- LWheatNet: a lightweight convolutional neural network with mixed attention mechanism for wheat seed classification.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Combined with Hyperspectral Imaging Technology for Variety Discrimination ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A model for genuineness detection in genetically and phenotypically similar maize variety seeds based on hyperspectral imaging and machine learning.Plant methods · 2022Article
- Nondestructive Testing of Pear Based on Fourier Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Classification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Fast Identification of Soybean Seed Varieties Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Combined With Convolutional Neural Network.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Nondestructive Classification of Soybean Seed Varieties by Hyperspectral Imaging and Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging is a nondestructive testing technology that integrates spectroscopy and iconology technologies, which enables us to quickly obtain both internal and external information of objects and identify crop seed varieties. First, the hyperspectral images of ten soybean seed varieties were collected and the reflectance was obtained. Savitzky-Golay smoothing (SG), first derivative (FD), standard normal variate (SNV), fast Fourier transform (FFT), Hilbert transform (HT), and multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) spectral reflectance pretreatment methods were used. Then, the feature wavelengths and feature information of the pretreated spectral reflectance data were extracted using competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), the successive projections algorithm (SPA), and principal component analysis (PCA). Finally, 5 classifiers, Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), ensemble learning (EL), and artificial neural network (ANN), were used to identify seed varieties. The results showed that MSC-CARS-EL had the highest accuracy among the 90 combinations, with training set, test set, and 5-fold cross-validation accuracies of 100%, 100%, and 99.8%, respectively. Moreover, the contribution of spectral pretreatment to discrimination accuracy was higher than those of feature extraction and classifier selection. Pretreatment methods determined the range of the identification accuracy, feature-selective methods and classifiers only changed within this range. The experimental results provide a good reference for the identification of other crop seed varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.