Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31795109›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior-A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity.

Lena V Kallings, Sven J G Olsson, Örjan Ekblom, Elin Ekblom-Bak, Mats Börjesson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Validity of Three Survey Questions for Self-Assessed Sedentary Time.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lena V KallingsÅstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-9702
Sven J G OlssonÅstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Örjan EkblomÅstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Elin Ekblom-BakÅstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats BörjessonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology and Institute of Food, Nutrition and Sport Science, Göteborg University, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to assess the concurrent and convergent validity of the GIH stationary single-item question (SED-GIH). Data were obtained in 2013 and 2014 from two Swedish cohorts. A total of 711 men and women provided valid accelerometer data (Actigraph GT3X+) and were included for concurrent validity analyses. A total of 560 individuals answered three additional commonly used sedentary questions, and were included for convergent validity analysis. The SED-GIH displayed a significant correlation with total stationary time (r

Indexed as

AccelerometrySedentary BehaviorAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSurveys and Questionnairesaccelerometrymeasurementpublic healthsedentary behaviorsurveys and questionnairesvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID31795109
PMCPMC6926785
OpenAlexW2989872759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.