Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31794521›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2020

The impact of localized implementation: determining the cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention and care interventions across six United States cities.

Emanuel Krebs, Xiao Zang, Benjamin Enns, Jeong E Min, Czarina N Behrends, Carlos Del Rio, Julia C Dombrowski, Daniel J Feaster, Kelly A Gebo, Matthew Golden and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. National Hospitalization Rates and In-Hospital Mortality Rates of HIV-Related Opportunistic Infections in the United States, 2011-2018.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reply.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Emanuel KrebsBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver.
Xiao ZangBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver.
Benjamin EnnsBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver.
Jeong E MinBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver.
Czarina N BehrendsDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Carlos Del RioRollins School of Public Health and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Julia C DombrowskiDivision of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Daniel J FeasterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Kelly A GeboSchool of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthew GoldenDivision of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Brandon D L MarshallSchool of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Lisa R MetschDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Bruce R SchackmanDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Steven ShoptawSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Steffanie A StrathdeeSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Bohdan NosykBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver.
Localized Economic Modeling Study Group

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Nina Thawata Harawa · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Utilization of health services after engagement with opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provider by individuals with and without post-traumatic stress disorderP30DA040500 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ZACHARY Franklin MEISEL · 2015 to 2026
$20.7M
Impact of Drug Policy Reform on the HIV Risk Environment among IDUs in TijuanaR37DA019829 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2010 to 2019
$6.7M
Localized economic modeling to support implementation of the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiativeR01DA041747 · NIDA · SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY · PI NOSYK, BOHDAN · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA040500NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041747NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA019829NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffective interventions to reduce the public health burden of HIV/AIDS can vary in their ability to deliver value at different levels of scale and in different epidemiological contexts. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of HIV treatment and prevention interventions implemented at previously documented scales of delivery in six US cities with diverse HIV microepidemics.

designDynamic HIV transmission model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

methodsWe identified and estimated previously documented scale of delivery and costs for 16 evidence-based interventions from the US CDC's Compendium of Evidence-Based Interventions and Best Practices for HIV Prevention. Using a model calibrated for Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City and Seattle, we estimated averted HIV infections, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (healthcare perspective; 3% discount rate, 2018$US), for each intervention and city (10-year implementation) compared with the status quo over a 20-year time horizon.

resultsIncreased HIV testing was cost-saving or cost-effective across cities. Targeted preexposure prophylaxis for high-risk MSM was cost-saving in Miami and cost-effective in Atlanta ($6123/QALY), Baltimore ($18 333/QALY) and Los Angeles ($86 117/QALY). Interventions designed to improve antiretroviral therapy initiation provided greater value than other treatment engagement interventions. No single intervention was projected to reduce HIV incidence by more than 10.1% in any city.

conclusionCombination implementation strategies should be tailored to local epidemiological contexts to provide the most value. Complementary strategies addressing factors hindering access to HIV care will be necessary to meet targets for HIV elimination in the United States.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPrimary PreventionSexual and Gender MinoritiesBaltimoreCitiesCost-Benefit AnalysisHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNew York CityQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31794521
PMCPMC7046093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.