Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31793899›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2019

Molecular replacement using structure predictions from databases.

Adam J Simpkin, Jens M H Thomas, Felix Simkovic, Ronan M Keegan, Daniel J Rigden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modes and model building in SHELXE.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Predicted models and CCP4.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Implications of AlphaFold2 for crystallographic phasing by molecular replacement.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Redeployment of automated MrBUMP search-model identification for map fitting in cryo-EM.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Using Phaser and ensembles to improve the performance of SIMBAD.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam J SimpkinInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, England.
Jens M H ThomasInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, England.
Felix SimkovicInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, England.
Ronan M KeeganSTFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Research Complex at Harwell, Didcot OX11 0FA, England.
Daniel J RigdenInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, England.ORCID 0000-0002-7565-8937

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L009544/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular replacement (MR) is the predominant route to solution of the phase problem in macromolecular crystallography. Where the lack of a suitable homologue precludes conventional MR, one option is to predict the target structure using bioinformatics. Such modelling, in the absence of homologous templates, is called ab initio or de novo modelling. Recently, the accuracy of such models has improved significantly as a result of the availability, in many cases, of residue-contact predictions derived from evolutionary covariance analysis. Covariance-assisted ab initio models representing structurally uncharacterized Pfam families are now available on a large scale in databases, potentially representing a valuable and easily accessible supplement to the PDB as a source of search models. Here, the unconventional MR pipeline AMPLE is employed to explore the value of structure predictions in the GREMLIN and PconsFam databases. It was tested whether these deposited predictions, processed in various ways, could solve the structures of PDB entries that were subsequently deposited. The results were encouraging: nine of 27 GREMLIN cases were solved, covering target lengths of 109-355 residues and a resolution range of 1.4-2.9 Å, and with target-model shared sequence identity as low as 20%. The cluster-and-truncate approach in AMPLE proved to be essential for most successes. For the overall lower quality structure predictions in the PconsFam database, remodelling with Rosetta within the AMPLE pipeline proved to be the best approach, generating ensemble search models from single-structure deposits. Finally, it is shown that the AMPLE-obtained search models deriving from GREMLIN deposits are of sufficiently high quality to be selected by the sequence-independent MR pipeline SIMBAD. Overall, the results help to point the way towards the optimal use of the expanding databases of ab initio structure predictions.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAlgorithmsCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareProteinsab initio modellingab initio structure predictionsdatabasesmolecular replacement

Identifiers

PMID31793899
PMCPMC6889911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.